[latexrefman] --file-line-errror

Vincent Belaïche vincent.belaiche at gmail.com
Thu Apr 23 07:14:39 CEST 2020


See https://github.com/MiKTeX/miktex/issues/509

Le jeu. 23 avr. 2020 à 06:20, Vincent Belaïche
<vincent.belaiche at gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> OK, I will re-insall the latest MiKTeX and re-check the --help message
> before posting the bug report.
> Concerning the other points,  I just noted them in the TODO comments
> at the beginning of the French version, so I do not forget them.
> My primary objective is to complete the alignment of fr over en, in
> order to republish the fr version. If I keep at that pace of roughly
> one node every other day that should be possible by end of May.
>
>   V.
>
> Le jeu. 23 avr. 2020 à 00:46, Karl Berry <karl at freefriends.org> a écrit :
> >
> >     Subject: [latexrefman] --file-line-errror
> >     Concerning this option, I would like to mention that MiKTeX has it ---
> >
> > Good! I don't have any way to actually run miktex, all I can go by is
> > the help message, which doesn't list it. Maybe it would be worth making
> > a bug report to miktex to include it there.
> >
> >     MiKTeX also has --shell-escape.
> >
> > Same story.
> >
> >     Also, it might be worth mentioning that error produced before the
> >     first file input will have the tradictional style, so
> >
> > Ok.
> >
> >     Also, for the jobname, w/o the jobname cli option, this is the 1st
> >     \input explicit or *implicit*. Ie. the command above make a jobname
> >     equal to <<minimal>> because \documentclass implicitely under the hood
> >
> > Ok.
> >
> > I think there would need to be a new node devoted to jobname.
> > It is too much to put into one item in a longer list.
> >
> >     the French version and send a pointer to the diff so that somebody
> >     better at English than I am can translate it.
> >
> > Nevertheless, if you can write an initial English version, I could work
> > with it. I can't do anything useful with French. I would just have to
> > put into a translate program and go from there, and I'm sure you would
> > do better than that :). --thanks, karl.



More information about the latexrefman mailing list.