[XeTeX] XeLatex + Unicode + Footnote issue
Sreenivasa Guttal
sreenivasa.guttal at gmail.com
Thu Mar 19 09:20:22 CET 2009
Yes. For some Sanskrit fonts, I saw it partially working.
I am a bit new to `tex world'. Is there a way out? This is a very important
feature for critical editions.
Thanks,
Sreenivasa
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Ulrike Fischer <news3 at nililand.de> wrote:
> Am Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:04:02 -0400 schrieb Patrick Carr:
>
> >> I can reproduce the problem even with normal english text. It seems
> >> to be font related, some fonts gives footnotes as expected in
> >> para-mode and other not.
> >
> > I thought it might be fonts with real superscript numerals versus
> > those without, but no. Using your example with a myriad of fonts, I
> > got newlines for each footnote regardless of the font I used. I.e., it
> > didn't work at all for me. At least it wasn't intermittent.
> >
> > (This is XeTeXk, Version 3.1415926-2.2-0.999.6 (Web2C 7.5.7))
>
>
> I too no longer get different behaviour if I use only manyfoot
> (that's quite confusing, I don't think that I changed something),
> but if I use bigfoot instead it reappears: Verdana gives newline,
> Cambria not.
>
> I too suspected the superscripts at first, but
> \makeatletter\let\@textsuperscript\relax gives normal numbers but
> doesn't change the behaviour.
>
> --
> Ulrike Fischer
>
> _______________________________________________
> XeTeX mailing list
> postmaster at tug.org
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20090319/876f811b/attachment.html
More information about the XeTeX
mailing list