[texworks] Help files for Scripting
Paul A Norman
paul.a.norman at gmail.com
Fri Jun 4 16:03:39 CEST 2021
Really appreciate you taking the time to address this, and your suggestion
sounds really valuable.
Having everything together – TeXworks msnual and the API help (TwScript :-)
would be great.
Henrik's suggestion on Bookdown looks very good. I should not be surprised
if that could some how be used to some useful degree in a GitHub
The extended MD syntax of Bookdown certainly looks very useful.
Even if the MD source files were to be taken client side and put through
Pandoc, and the results uploaded back to the Git hub repository, we'd still
have a central editable repository for the source files.
I know that MD —> Pandoc produced html can also be uploaded to GitHub as a
I might be out of touch for just a few days. If Henrik is still following
this thread, his thoughts and others' might also be valuable at this point.
There may be other options for a compliant repository for theBookdown MD,
perhaps others might chime in here, the Bookdown reccomendation I think
handles everything out of the box for "post-production" (html pdf docx) I
If that is not essential then GitHub would be great.
I do believe that the application I've been using to make the TwScript API
help – html pdf etc. – HelpnDoc, can throw out MD (I think that they list
three available dialects) so that may give us a base to start from using
the work already done to date to seed the new project.
Going forward I could put a redirect on the existing TwScript api web site
If we can settle on simillar if not identical processes for the TeXworks
main manual, and repository, it would make a lot of sense.
There may be a way to process the existing TeXworks manual's work to MD to
seed it's initial project as well.
If not from pure LaTeX(?) then initially from the html to MD may be
Seems things are starting to look good on this documenation front overall
On Saturday, 5 June 2021, Stefan Löffler <st.loeffler at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Paul,
> sorry for not writing sooner, busy as always... :/
> On 30.04.21 09:40, Paul A Norman wrote:
> Thanks Henrik,
> That is certainly very helpful.
> "A nice example is the bookdown R package, that makes it easy to suggest
a change to a book through a github pull request.
> You can see it in action here —
> I know that other LaTeX documentation is produced through intermediary
formats, and this one is looking like a good approach.
> We may need, whatever option is followed, some sort of "safe" server, as
all too often for commercial or other reasons, public "free" hosting
options are withdrawn often with little or no warning. May be in this case
the situation is safer?
> If it helps, I can definitely create a new repository on Github in the
"TeXworks organization" and give you write access to it.
> In fact, I was going to propose to look into the markdown support for
Github Pages (i.e., writing stuff in markdown, publishing it to Github, and
getting it rendered nicely). The result would be something akin to
https://stloeffler.github.io/texworks-testing/ (the theme is customizable
;)), though probably at a url similar to texworks.github.io/js-api-doc.
> I am quite happy to just dive into any realistic option, and MarkDown as
provided up by Bookdown is looking like a very viable option indeed.
> Not sure what the differences (benefits) are between MarkDown and
> Anyway, please let me know what you find, as I have been toying with the
idea of converting the "main" manual to markdown as well (for easier
writing, editing, and conversion to multiple formats).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the texworks