[texhax] texhax Digest, Vol 2010, Issue 73

Predrag Punosevac punosevac72 at gmail.com
Wed Feb 24 16:20:12 CET 2010


texhax-request at tug.org wrote:

> Send texhax mailing list submissions to
> 	texhax at tug.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/texhax
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	texhax-request at tug.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	texhax-owner at tug.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of texhax digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Multiple indicies (hh)
>    2. generating table headers with slanted text (Jeff Hamann)
>    3. Q: paragraph spacing after using supertabular
>       (Miriam Gerrits - CITG)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:18:18 -0300
> From: "hh" <hh-brasil at bol.com.br>
> To: texhax at tug.org
> Subject: Re: [texhax] Multiple indicies
> Message-ID: <4B850AFA.12470.4187B2 at hh-brasil.bol.com.br>
>
> Try 
> \let\cleardoublepage\clearpage 
> immediately before the problem starts. Should get rid of the empty 
> pages.
> hh
>
>
> From:           	texhax-request at tug.org
> Subject:        	texhax Digest, Vol 2010, Issue 72
> To:             	texhax at tug.org
> Send reply to:  	texhax at tug.org
> Date sent:      	Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:00:01 +0100
>
> > Send texhax mailing list submissions to
> > 	texhax at tug.org
> > 
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > 	http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/texhax
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > 	texhax-request at tug.org
> > 
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > 	texhax-owner at tug.org
> > 
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of texhax digest..."
> > 
> > 
> > Today's Topics:
> > 
> >    1. Re: Multiple indicies (Khoa Le)
> > 
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:09:49 +1100
> > From: Khoa Le <lenkhoa at gmail.com>
> > To: texhax at tug.org, faq-devel at tex.ac.uk
> > Subject: Re: [texhax] Multiple indicies
> > Message-ID:
> > 	<6950e0751002222109t52e3cfbdta7bea38c99efb3b8 at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> > 
> > Hi there
> > 
> > Thank you very much for your page on multiple indices. I found that very
> > useful and it is exactly what I need. While the page explained very well how
> > to generate multiple indices, I have got the indices that I wanted, but with
> > the "Author Index" printed as a section, then a blank page page, then the
> > actual author index itself with the title "Index" as a chapter. The same
> > thing goes for the "general" index. So there are two blank pages and I have
> > tried many ways to remove them but so far unsuccessful. The code that I
> > used:
> > 
> > \usepackage{multind}
> > \makeindex{general}
> > \makeindex{authors}
> > ...
> > ...
> > \printindex{general}{General Index}
> > \printindex{authors}{Author Index}
> > 
> > Could you please help? I think the main thing is the \printindex command was
> > not modified.
> > 
> > Greatly appreciated for your reply.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Khoa
> > 
> > Dr. Khoa N. Le
> > Senior Lecturer
> > School of Engineering, Building XB,
> > University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797,
> > Penrith South DC, NSW 1797, Australia
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/texhax/attachments/20100223/aa9d997b/attachment-0001.html>
> > 
> > ------------------------------
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > texhax mailing list
> > texhax at tug.org
> > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/texhax
> > 
> > End of texhax Digest, Vol 2010, Issue 72
> > ****************************************
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:12:37 -0800
> From: Jeff Hamann <jeff.hamann at moneytree.com>
> To: texhax at tug.org
> Subject: [texhax] generating table headers with slanted text
> Message-ID: <F281895E-4201-404D-AD36-60B350AADDDC at moneytree.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Tex-ers:
>
> I'm trying to generate "consumer reports" type tables, with lots of filled colored dots, slanted text for column headers and style boxes. I'm getting this feeling I'll have to construct the tables using source code (i.e. Sweave). Are there any packages for producing these types of tables?
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff.
>
> Jeff D. Hamann, PhD
> 2430 NW Professional Drive
> Corvallis, Oregon 97330
> 877-421-9815
> jeff.hamann[at]moneytree[dot]com
> http://www.moneytree.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:12:20 +0100
> From: "Miriam Gerrits - CITG" <A.M.J.Gerrits at tudelft.nl>
> To: <texhax at tug.org>
> Subject: [texhax] Q: paragraph spacing after using supertabular
> Message-ID:
> 	<BD7EA5CCD0FC6441941CEBE547EA266401351086 at SRV503.tudelft.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi, 
> I am using supertabular, but encounted a problem with the paragraph 
> spacing after using generating a supertable. I hope someone can help 
> me. 
>
>
> Before the table there is a white line between the paragraphs in the 
> final output, forced by \\ and an empty line in the code. After the 
> table the white line in the output is gone, although I still use \\ + 
> empty line in the code. 
>
>
> Does anyone know, how I get the white line back also after using the 
> supertabular?? 
>
>
> Below an example of the code, which shows the difference between 
> paragraph spacing before and after the supertabular. 
>
>
> Thanks! 
> Miriam 
>
>
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 
> \documentclass{book} 
> \usepackage[sectionbib]{natbib} 
> \usepackage{supertabular} 
> \usepackage{lscape} 
>
>
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 
>
>
> \begin{document} 
> \section{Introduction} 
> or process due to lack off radiation under the canopy, past research 
> studies show that it can vary between 10-50\% of throughfall. In Table 
> \ref{tab:ffi_values} an overview of past results on forest floor 
> interception are presented.\\ 
>
>
> isotope fractionation. Since transpiration does not fractionate water 
> and interception evaporation does, this could be a way of separating 
> the two evaporation processes. 
>
>
> \begin{landscape} 
> \begin{center} 
> \tablefirsthead{% 
> \hline 
> Source                                    & Forest floor 
> type                      &Location         &$hoi$ [mm]&$hoi$ [\%]\\ 
> [2.5ex] 
> \hline} 
>
>
> \tablehead{% 
> \multicolumn{5}{l}{\small\sl continued from previous page}\\ 
> \hline 
> Source                                    & Forest floor 
> type                      &Location         &$hoi$ [mm]&$hoi$ [\%]\\ 
> [2.5ex] 
> \hline} 
>
>
> \tabletail{% 
> \hline 
> \multicolumn{5}{r}{\small\sl continued on next page}\\ 
>
>
> } 
>
>
> \tablelasttail{\hline} 
> \bottomcaption{Forest floor interception values in literature, with 
> the water storage capacity $hoi$ and the interception evaporation $hoi 
> $ as percentage of net precipitation (i.e., throughfall).} 
>
>
> \begin{supertabular}{p{5cm} p{7cm} p{2.5cm} l c } 
>          \hline 
>
>
>          \hline 
>             \citet{Haynes1940}                  &Kentucky bluegrass 
> (\textit{Poa pratensis})      & ?            & 
> &56\footnotemark[1]\\ 
>             \citet{Kittredge1948}               &Californian grass 
> (\textit{Avena, Stipa, Lolium, Bromus})& USA (CA)   & 
> &26\footnotemark[1]\\ 
>             \citet{Beard1956}                     &\textit{Themeda} \& 
> \textit{Cymbopogon}   & South Africa&          &13\footnotemark[1]\\ 
>             \citet{Helvey1964}                  & 
> Poplar                                     & USA (NC) 
> &            &34\\ 
>             \citet{Brechtel1969}               & Scot's 
> pine                                 & USA (NY)    &           & 21\\ 
>                                                          & Norway 
> spruce                              & USA (NY)   &           & 16\\ 
>                                                          & 
> Beech                                          & USA (NY) 
> &             & 16\\ 
>                                                          & 
> Oak                                             & USA (NY) 
> &             & 11\\ 
>             \citet{Pathak1985}                  &\textit{Shorea 
> robusta}   \& \textit{Mallotus philippensis}            & 
> India            &            &11.8\\ 
>                                                          & 
> \textit{Pinus roxburghii} \& \textit{Quercus glauca} &India&&7.8\\ 
>                                                          & 
> \textit{Pinus roxburghii}&India&&9.6\\ 
>                                                          & 
> \textit{Quercus leucotrichophora} \& \textit{Pinus roxburghii} 
> &India&&10.6\\ 
>                                                          & 
> \textit{Quercus floribunda} \& \textit{Quercus leucotrichophora} 
> &India&&11.0\\ 
>                                                          & 
> \textit{Quercus lanuginosa} \& \textit{Quercus floribunda}&India&&11.3\ 
> \ 
>             \citet{Clark1940} in \citet{Thurow1987}   & Blue stem 
> \textit{Andropogon gerardi Vitman}&USA (TX)         &          &57-84\ 
> \ 
>             \citet{Walsh1977}                     &Pine (\textit{Pinus 
> sylvestris})   &United Kingdom&0.6-1.7&\\ 
>                                                          &Beech 
> (\textit{Fagus sylvaticus})&United Kingdom&0.9-2.8&\\ 
>             \citet{Pitman1989}                  &Bracken litter 
> (\textit{Pteridium aquiliunum})&United Kingdom&1.67&\\ 
>             \citet{Miller1990}                  &Norway 
> spruce                              & Scotland      & 
> &18\footnotemark[1]\\ 
>                                                          &Sitka 
> spruce                                 & Scotland      & 
> &16\footnotemark[1]\\ 
> \citet{Thamm1995}                     &Beech (\textit{Asperulo- 
> Fagetum})& Germany         &2.5-3.0   &12-28\\ 
>             \citet{Putuhena1996}                &\textit{Pinus 
> radiata}                  & Australia      & 2.78      &\\ 
>
>
> &Eucalyptus                                    &   Australia      & 
> 1.70      &\\ 
> \citet{Schaap1997}                   &Douglas 
> fir                                  & Netherlands   & 
> &0.23 mm d$^{-1}$\\ 
>             \citet{Li2000}                        &Peble mulch 
> (5-9cm)                      & China            &0.281 
> &11.5\footnotemark[1]\\ 
>                                                          &Peble mulch 
> (2-6cm)                     & China            &0.526 
> &17.4\footnotemark[1]\\ 
> \citet{Sato2004}                    & \textit{Cryptomeria 
> japonica}      & Japan            & 0.27-1.72&\\ 
>                                                          & 
> \textit{Lithocarpus edulis}         & Japan            & 0.67-3.05&\ 
> \                                                   \citet{Guevara- 
> Escobar2007}      &Grass (\textit{Aristida divaricata})& 
> Mexico         & 2.5         &\\ 
>                                                          &Woodchips 
> (\textit{Pinus})            & Mexico         &   8            &\\ 
>                                                          &Poplar 
> leaves (\textit{Populus nigra})& Mexico   &   2.3         &\\ 
>             \citet{Gerrits2007b}               &Mosses \& 
> grasses                        & Netherlands 
> &3-15\footnotemark[2]            &52\footnotemark[1]\\ 
>             \citet{Gerrits2009d}               &Beech (\textit{Fagus 
> sylvatica})& Luxembourg   &   1.0-2.8   &10-35\footnotemark[1]\\ 
>
>
>             \hline 
>
>
>       \end{supertabular} 
>       \footnotetext[1]{percentage of gross precipitation instead of 
> net precipitation} 
>       \footnotetext[2]{also includes soil moisture storage} 
>       \label{tab:ffi_values} 
> \end{center} 
> \end{landscape} 
>
>
> A remarkable difference between canopy and forest floor interception 
> is the relatively small interception storage capacity 
> he forest floor. On the other hand, the canopy has a larger 
> evaporative potential compared to forest floor \citep{Baird1999}. The 
> higher evaporative potential is caused by more turbulent wind fluxes 
> at the canopy level and more available radiation.\\ 
>
>
> Another important difference is the large seasonal influence on canopy 
> interception and the rather constant  considered.\\ 
> \end{document} 
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/texhax/attachments/20100224/8b853355/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> texhax mailing list
> texhax at tug.org
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/texhax
>
> End of texhax Digest, Vol 2010, Issue 73
> ****************************************


More information about the texhax mailing list