<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16981" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV>
<DIV id=inbdy><A name=msg_8834509c77edbbaa></A>Hi, <BR>I am using supertabular,
but encounted a problem with the paragraph <BR>spacing after using generating a
supertable. I hope someone can help <BR>me. <BR>
<P>Before the table there is a white line between the paragraphs in the
<BR>final output, forced by \\ and an empty line in the code. After the
<BR>table the white line in the output is gone, although I still use \\ +
<BR>empty line in the code. <BR>
<P>Does anyone know, how I get the white line back also after using the
<BR>supertabular?? <BR>
<P>Below an example of the code, which shows the difference between
<BR>paragraph spacing before and after the supertabular. <BR>
<P>Thanks! <BR>Miriam <BR>
<P>%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% <BR>\documentclass{book}
<BR>\usepackage[sectionbib]{natbib} <BR>\usepackage{supertabular}
<BR>\usepackage{lscape} <BR>
<P>%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
<BR>%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% <BR>
<P>\begin{document} <BR>\section{Introduction} <BR>or process due to lack off
radiation under the canopy, past research <BR>studies show that it can vary
between 10-50\% of throughfall. In Table <BR>\ref{tab:ffi_values} an overview of
past results on forest floor <BR>interception are presented.\\ <BR>
<P>isotope fractionation. Since transpiration does not fractionate water <BR>and
interception evaporation does, this could be a way of separating <BR>the two
evaporation processes. <BR>
<P>\begin{landscape} <BR>\begin{center} <BR>\tablefirsthead{% <BR>\hline
<BR>Source
& Forest floor
<BR>type
&Location &$hoi$ [mm]&$hoi$ [\%]\\
<BR>[2.5ex] <BR>\hline} <BR>
<P>\tablehead{% <BR>\multicolumn{5}{l}{\small\sl continued from previous page}\\
<BR>\hline <BR>Source
&
Forest floor <BR>type
&Location &$hoi$
[mm]&$hoi$ [\%]\\ <BR>[2.5ex] <BR>\hline} <BR>
<P>\tabletail{% <BR>\hline <BR>\multicolumn{5}{r}{\small\sl continued on next
page}\\ <BR>
<P>
<DIV class=qt id=qhide_168612 style="DISPLAY: block">}
<BR><BR></DIV>\tablelasttail{\hline} <BR>\bottomcaption{Forest floor
interception values in literature, with <BR>the water storage capacity $hoi$ and
the interception evaporation $hoi <BR>$ as percentage of net precipitation
(i.e., throughfall).} <BR>
<P>\begin{supertabular}{p{5cm} p{7cm} p{2.5cm} l c } <BR>
\hline <BR>
<P> \hline <BR>
\citet{Haynes1940}
&Kentucky bluegrass <BR>(\textit{Poa pratensis})
& ? &
<BR>&56\footnotemark[1]\\ <BR>
\citet{Kittredge1948}
&Californian grass <BR>(\textit{Avena, Stipa, Lolium, Bromus})& USA (CA)
& <BR>&26\footnotemark[1]\\ <BR>
\citet{Beard1956}
&\textit{Themeda} \& <BR>\textit{Cymbopogon}
& South Africa&
&13\footnotemark[1]\\ <BR>
\citet{Helvey1964}
& <BR>Poplar
& USA
(NC) <BR>& &34\\ <BR>
\citet{Brechtel1969}
& Scot's <BR>pine
& USA (NY) &
& 21\\ <BR>
& Norway
<BR>spruce
& USA (NY) &
& 16\\ <BR>
& <BR>Beech
& USA (NY) <BR>&
& 16\\ <BR>
& <BR>Oak
& USA (NY) <BR>& & 11\\
<BR> \citet{Pathak1985}
&\textit{Shorea <BR>robusta}
\& \textit{Mallotus philippensis}
& <BR>India &
&11.8\\ <BR>
& <BR>\textit{Pinus roxburghii} \& \textit{Quercus
glauca} &India&&7.8\\ <BR>
& <BR>\textit{Pinus roxburghii}&India&&9.6\\ <BR>
& <BR>\textit{Quercus
leucotrichophora} \& \textit{Pinus roxburghii}
<BR>&India&&10.6\\ <BR>
& <BR>\textit{Quercus floribunda} \& \textit{Quercus
leucotrichophora} <BR>&India&&11.0\\ <BR>
& <BR>\textit{Quercus lanuginosa} \& \textit{Quercus
floribunda}&India&&11.3\ <BR>\ <BR>
\citet{Clark1940} in \citet{Thurow1987} & Blue stem
<BR>\textit{Andropogon gerardi Vitman}&USA (TX)
& &57-84\ <BR>\ <BR>
\citet{Walsh1977}
&Pine (\textit{Pinus <BR>sylvestris})
&United Kingdom&0.6-1.7&\\ <BR>
&Beech <BR>(\textit{Fagus sylvaticus})&United
Kingdom&0.9-2.8&\\ <BR>
\citet{Pitman1989}
&Bracken litter <BR>(\textit{Pteridium aquiliunum})&United
Kingdom&1.67&\\ <BR>
\citet{Miller1990}
&Norway <BR>spruce
& Scotland
& <BR>&18\footnotemark[1]\\ <BR>
&Sitka <BR>spruce
& Scotland & <BR>&16\footnotemark[1]\\
<BR>\citet{Thamm1995}
&Beech (\textit{Asperulo- <BR>Fagetum})& Germany
&2.5-3.0 &12-28\\ <BR>
\citet{Putuhena1996}
&\textit{Pinus <BR>radiata}
& Australia & 2.78
&\\ <BR>
<P>&Eucalyptus
&
Australia & <BR>1.70 &\\
<BR>\citet{Schaap1997}
&Douglas <BR>fir
&
Netherlands & <BR>&0.23 mm d$^{-1}$\\ <BR>
\citet{Li2000}
&Peble mulch <BR>(5-9cm)
& China
&0.281
<BR>&11.5\footnotemark[1]\\ <BR>
&Peble mulch <BR>(2-6cm)
& China
&0.526 <BR>&17.4\footnotemark[1]\\ <BR>\citet{Sato2004}
&
\textit{Cryptomeria <BR>japonica} & Japan
& 0.27-1.72&\\ <BR>
& <BR>\textit{Lithocarpus edulis}
& Japan &
0.67-3.05&\ <BR>\
\citet{Guevara- <BR>Escobar2007}
&Grass (\textit{Aristida divaricata})& <BR>Mexico
& 2.5 &\\
<BR>
&Woodchips
<BR>(\textit{Pinus}) & Mexico
& 8
&\\ <BR>
&Poplar
<BR>leaves (\textit{Populus nigra})& Mexico & 2.3
&\\ <BR>
\citet{Gerrits2007b}
&Mosses \& <BR>grasses
& Netherlands
<BR>&3-15\footnotemark[2]
&52\footnotemark[1]\\ <BR>
\citet{Gerrits2009d} &Beech
(\textit{Fagus <BR>sylvatica})& Luxembourg & 1.0-2.8
&10-35\footnotemark[1]\\ <BR>
<P> \hline <BR>
<P> \end{supertabular} <BR>
\footnotetext[1]{percentage of gross precipitation instead of <BR>net
precipitation} <BR> \footnotetext[2]{also includes soil
moisture storage} <BR> \label{tab:ffi_values}
<BR>\end{center} <BR>\end{landscape} <BR>
<P>A remarkable difference between canopy and forest floor interception <BR>is
the relatively small interception storage capacity <BR>he forest floor. On the
other hand, the canopy has a larger <BR>evaporative potential compared to forest
floor \citep{Baird1999}. The <BR>higher evaporative potential is caused by more
turbulent wind fluxes <BR>at the canopy level and more available radiation.\\
<BR>
<P>Another important difference is the large seasonal influence on canopy
<BR>interception and the rather constant considered.\\ <BR>\end{document}
<BR></P></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>