[texhax] postscript printing
Robin.Fairbairns at cl.cam.ac.uk
Thu Jun 24 11:31:05 CEST 2004
> On Thu, June 24 2004 04:25, Robin Fairbairns wrote:
> > you don't in general _want_ "postscript" for inclusion in (la)tex
> > documents, since general postscript is not self-contained and can muck
> > things up in areas around it, quite apart from the sort of peculiarity
> > you're seeing.
> But then why do postscript images created in R are perfectly visible on the
> dvi file created by latex'ing the original '.tex' file?
i presume "r" (which i've never used) is _only_ producing images (rather
than complete documents, as oo is capable of), so confusingly creates
eps when it says it's producing ps.
> > does openoffice not offer "encapsulated postscript" (.eps) output? if
> > it does, use that. if it doesn't, either use the postscript output you
> > _do_ get, or investigate translation functions like those in gsview.
> I'm using the latest OOo version (1.1) and, at least in Calc, there's only an
> option to print to a postscript file. No 'eps', unfortunately.
sigh. perhaps it feels it has to be grotty, since it's emulating m$
apps, and they don't typically get eps right...
More information about the texhax