[texhax] postscript printing
sluque at mun.ca
Thu Jun 24 10:27:42 CEST 2004
On Thu, June 24 2004 04:25, Robin Fairbairns wrote:
> you don't in general _want_ "postscript" for inclusion in (la)tex
> documents, since general postscript is not self-contained and can muck
> things up in areas around it, quite apart from the sort of peculiarity
> you're seeing.
But then why do postscript images created in R are perfectly visible on the
dvi file created by latex'ing the original '.tex' file?
> does openoffice not offer "encapsulated postscript" (.eps) output? if
> it does, use that. if it doesn't, either use the postscript output you
> _do_ get, or investigate translation functions like those in gsview.
I'm using the latest OOo version (1.1) and, at least in Calc, there's only an
option to print to a postscript file. No 'eps', unfortunately.
Thanks for the suggestions.
More information about the texhax