[pdftex] RE: pdftex digest, Vol 1 #93 - 9 msgs

[Samuele Cavarero]

stooooooooooooooop sending mail!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pdftex-request at tug.org [mailto:pdftex-request at tug.org]
> Sent: lunedì 26 marzo 2001 11.06
> To: pdftex at tug.org
> Subject: pdftex digest, Vol 1 #93 - 9 msgs
> 
> 
> Send pdftex mailing list submissions to
> 	pdftex at tug.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/pdftex
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	pdftex-request at tug.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	pdftex-admin at tug.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of pdftex digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. strange bug! (Paulo Ney de Souza)
>    2. Re: strange bug! (Aiko Huckauf)
>    3. Re: strange bug! (Paulo Ney de Souza)
>    4. pdfTeX in the big business now (Colin Marquardt)
>    5. Re: strange bug! (Ross Moore)
>    6. Re: pdfTeX in the big business now (Donald Story)
>    7. Re: pdfTeX in the big business now (Ross Moore)
>    8. Re: pdfTeX in the big business now (Robert Howlett)
>    9. Re: pdfTeX in the big business now (Thomas Neumann)
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 12:30:51 -0800 (PST)
> From: Paulo Ney de Souza <desouza at math.berkeley.edu>
> To: pdftex at tug.org
> Subject: [pdftex] strange bug!
> 
> 
> In the process of porting a package to pdflatex we found the 
> following 
> strange behaviour in "pdflatex" and hopefully someone here can account
> for what is going on.
> 
> The file below, when processed with pdflatex and the 3 
> comments does NOT
> produce the second (uncommented) picture. If the 3 comments  
> are taken 
> OUT then it produces both pictures! The (strange) behaviour 
> does not show
> when one use stardard "latex"... so I am assuming it is a 
> problem with 
> "pdflatex". Does anyone knows what is going on ?
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> \documentclass{report}
> \usepackage[pdftex]{graphicx}
> \begin{document}
> This is a figure:
> 
> %\begin{figure}[h]
> %\includegraphics{foo}
> %\end{figure}
> 
> \begin{figure}[h]
> \includegraphics[bb= 100 300 200 500]{foo}
> \end{figure}
> 
> \end{document}
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> The problem seems to be independent of the graphics files foo.{ps,pdf}
> but just in case anyone needs it, you can get it at
> 
> 	http://www.math.berkeley.edu/~desouza/badpdf/
> 
> Paulo Ney
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 21:48:26 +0100
> From: Aiko Huckauf <Aiko.Huckauf at epost.de>
> Reply-To: Aiko Huckauf <Aiko.Huckauf at epost.de>
> To: pdftex at tug.org
> Subject: Re: [pdftex] strange bug!
> 
> Saturday, March 24, 2001, 9:30:51 PM, Paulo Ney de Souza wrote:
> 
> > The file below, when processed with pdflatex and the 3 
> comments does NOT
> > produce the second (uncommented) picture. If the 3 comments 
>  are taken 
> > OUT then it produces both pictures! The (strange) behaviour 
> does not show
> > when one use stardard "latex"... so I am assuming it is a 
> problem with 
> > "pdflatex". Does anyone knows what is going on ?
> 
> I have tested the document, both with one of my own pdf-graphics and
> the foo.pdf from you. I can't reproduce the problem - in my case
> everything worked fine, i. e. as expected: I get one graphic if I let
> the first picture commented and two graphics when I remove the
> comments.
> Are you sure your pdfTeX is set up correctly? Does it work with other
> .tex files? Which OS and which editor do you use? Maybe the problem is
> due to this. If not, I have no idea...
> 
> Greetings from Kiel
> 
> Aiko Huckauf
> 
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 13:53:59 -0800
> From: Paulo Ney de Souza <desouza at math.berkeley.edu>
> Reply-To: desouza at math.berkeley.edu
> To: Aiko Huckauf <Aiko.Huckauf at epost.de>
> CC: pdftex at tug.org, levy at msri.org
> Subject: Re: [pdftex] strange bug!
> 
> I get the problem when running both on our machines here at 
> Berkeley, as well
> as the pre-installed software under RedHat 7.0. Does anyone 
> know if the
> installs
> below are current ?
> 
> solaris 2.7 -> pdflatex -v
> pdfTeX (Web2C 7.3.1) 3.14159-0.14e-pretest-20000210
> kpathsea version 3.3.1
> Copyright (C) 1999 Han The Thanh, Petr Sojka, and Jiri Zlatuska.
>