[omega] Question about the paper published in EuroTeX 2005

[gabor.bella at enst-bretagne.fr]

> In the part about hypenation of "acke" to "ak-ke", the representation of
> the lexemes you provide can read as:
>
> { c=a | hyph=0; g=a }
>         ( bifurcation from glyph 1 to next glyphs 1 and 2 )
> { c=c | hyph=0; g=c | pseudo = k-hyph }
>         ( closing glyphs 1 and 2 to next glyph 1 )
> { c=k | hyph=0; g=k }
> { c=k | hyph=0; g=e }
>
> I do not understand the need of that "pseudo", what is difference
> between a "pseudo" and a "g" ?

When we include both the "g=c" and the "pseudo=k-hyph" glyphs in the "*"
texteme in "ba*ken", we don't know yet if the word will really be
hyphenated at that point. So we need to prepare for both cases. "*" will
either be replaced by a "c" glyph or by a "k" glyph and a hyphen.