[omega] Question about the paper published in EuroTeX 2005

[Benjamin BAYART]

	Hi,

I noticed that while reading the pre-prints before the conference, but
did not get enough time to discuss that with you in Pont-a-Mousson.

The sad point is that it will be hard to discuss that with e-mail since
it might require some drawing to be clear... let's try.

In the part about hypenation of "acke" to "ak-ke", the representation of
the lexemes you provide can read as:

{ c=a | hyph=0; g=a } 
        ( bifurcation from glyph 1 to next glyphs 1 and 2 )
{ c=c | hyph=0; g=c | pseudo = k-hyph }
        ( closing glyphs 1 and 2 to next glyph 1 )
{ c=k | hyph=0; g=k }
{ c=k | hyph=0; g=e }

I do not understand the need of that "pseudo", what is difference
between a "pseudo" and a "g" ?

Regards,

	Benjamin.