[luatex] [tex-live] lltxplatform integration
luigi.scarso at gmail.com
Fri Jun 5 11:47:49 CEST 2015
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Élie Roux <elie.roux at telecom-bretagne.eu>
> Le 05/06/2015 11:42, Norbert Preining a écrit :
> > On Fri, 05 Jun 2015, Élie Roux wrote:
> >> right .so? Or do you mean same binaries wouldn't be able to load the
> >> same .so file on a different OS?
> > Yes, that is the problem. We are not making a distinction between OS,
> > but ARCH-OS, for examples
> > x86_64-linux
> > which includes 64bit variants of all the major distributions, some
> > old, some new, some strange.
> > And no, we will not have
> > debian-x86_64-linux
> > centos-x86_64-linux
> > ffobar...
> > No way.
> Sure, I'm just trying to understand: do you mean that the x86_64-linux
> luatex binary (which is the same under Debian, Suse, etc.) would be able
> to load the x86_64-linux .so on Debian but not under Suse? Why would
> this happen?
dependencies unjustified, for example.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the luatex