[luatex] [tex-live] lltxplatform integration

luigi scarso luigi.scarso at gmail.com
Fri Jun 5 11:52:06 CEST 2015


On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:47 AM, luigi scarso <luigi.scarso at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Élie Roux <elie.roux at telecom-bretagne.eu>
> wrote:
>
>> Le 05/06/2015 11:42, Norbert Preining a écrit :
>> > On Fri, 05 Jun 2015, Élie Roux wrote:
>> >> right .so? Or do you mean same binaries wouldn't be able to load the
>> >> same .so file on a different OS?
>> >
>> > Yes, that is the problem. We are not making a distinction between OS,
>> > but ARCH-OS, for examples
>> >       x86_64-linux
>> > which includes 64bit variants of all the major distributions, some
>> > old, some new, some strange.
>> >
>> > And no, we will not have
>> >       debian-x86_64-linux
>> >       centos-x86_64-linux
>> >       ffobar...
>> > No way.
>>
>> Sure, I'm just trying to understand: do you mean that the x86_64-linux
>> luatex binary (which is the same under Debian, Suse, etc.) would be able
>> to load the x86_64-linux .so on Debian but not under Suse? Why would
>> this happen?
>
>
dependencies unsatisfied,  for example
(sorry for the typo)
-- 
luigi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/luatex/attachments/20150605/6ee15aa6/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the luatex mailing list