elie.roux at telecom-bretagne.eu
Mon May 10 20:37:18 CEST 2010
Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard a écrit :
> I'm all for \newcatcodetable (and \setcatcodetable accordingly). If
> agrees, we can move to it whenever you guys want to.
That would be great!
> I'm more reserved on \newattribute. Unlike "catcodetable", "attribute" is a very
> generic term, so chances are high it is already used. I grepped CTAN's macros
> directory for it, and fortunatly found no match (except of course Heiko's
> luatex.sty and packages using it). Unfortunately, at least one class not on CTAN
> is already using this name, see:
> We have to be aware that this class will be incompatible with luatexbase if we
> decide to use \newattribute. I'm not saying it is a showstopper, since we may
> also consider that the class is wrong to use such a generic name and should
> prefix its internal macros with a unique (or at least non-generic) string.
I'm in favor of moving to newattribute... but last time I wanted to do
such a thing, the blocking point was Karl... did he change his mind?
Anyway, I think a solution is also to write to the people who wrote the
class, there is a mail address on the page.
More information about the lualatex-dev