[latexrefman-discuss] \newenvironment (non starred) vs \newenvironment* (starred)

[Vincent Belaïche]

Le 06/11/2015 17:27, Johannes Böttcher a écrit :
>
>
> On 11/06/2015 04:38 PM, Vincent Belaïche wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Trying to update the translation of node \newenvironment &
>> \renewenvironment, I noted a discrepancy:
>>
>> English version:
>>
>>     Unlike @code{\newcommand} and @code{\renewcommand}, the
>>     @code{*}-forms @code{\newenvironment*} and @code{\renewcommand*} have
>>     the same effect as the forms with no @code{*}.
>>
>
> Shouldn't that be `@code{\renewenvironment*}' in the second line of that block?
>
>
Yes definitely, this is one more problem introduced by this change,
anyway I will restore the previous text.

[...]

>
>
> I am in favour of encouraging the starred form, arguments of
> environments should not contain multiple paragraphs. That's what the
> body of the environment is for. But of course, this is just my
> opinion.
>

Mine too. I will add one word about that.
   
>
> Johannes
>
>
  V.

---
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus