[dvipdfmx] missing annotation rectangle if the box contains no glyph

[Philip Taylor]

Ulrike Fischer wrote:

> We are here on the dvipdfmx list, and the document starts with
>
> \documentclass[dvipdfmx]{article}
>
> So use latex or xelatex.

Results using XeLaTeX no better :

> This is XeTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-0.999992 (TeX Live 2020/W32TeX) 
> (preloaded format=xelatex)
>
> restricted \write18 enabled.
>
> entering extended mode
>
> (./untitled-1.tex
>
> LaTeX2e <2020-02-02> patch level 5
>
> L3 programming layer <2020-06-03>
>
> (c:/TeX/Live/2020/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/article.cls
>
> Document Class: article 2019/12/20 v1.4l Standard LaTeX document class
>
> (c:/TeX/Live/2020/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/size10.clo))
>
>
> ! LaTeX3 Error: Backend request inconsistent with engine: using 
> 'xdvipdfmx'
>
> (LaTeX3) backend.
>
>
> For immediate help type H <return>.
>
> ...
>
> l.2 \begin{document}
>
> ?
>

/Philip Taylor/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://tug.org/pipermail/dvipdfmx/attachments/20200623/c08f5572/attachment.html>