Can identical code produce two different .pdf? Awe NiceTabular

[John C Frain]

When I click on your first link I get messages about tax refunds. Have you
been hacked.

On Fri 8 Sept 2023, 04:23 Darío via texhax, <texhax at tug.org> wrote:

> Hello! I am confused about this.
> This behavior in tables using Nice Tabular has been giving me a headache
> for a long time. I consulted him in tex.stackexchange:
> https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/694224/horizontal-rules-or-not-horizontal-rules-in-nicetabular
> was closed for unlessclarity.
>
> But today I find myself writing a code, and then compile the tables was
> perfect, as I wanted, ie: vertical lines, double vertical lines and the
> colors in the rows. For clarity, this file will be called good file.tex
>
> Seeing that it worked, I tried copying a code that wasn't working for me
> to another file, called filebad.tex.
>
> I copied the portion that didn't work to the filegood.tex, then compile
> and perfect! the tables that don't work in filebad work fine in filegood.
> Is it possible?? It baffles me.
>
> Both files it have the same package, the only difference is that filebad
> is a book and filegood is an article and the book have \tableofcontents ¿?
>
> The compilation use this command line (I use geany to compile with F8 key,
> on Debian 12):
> latex --file-line-error-style -output-directory=/tmp "%f" && dvipdf
> /tmp/"%e.dvi"
>
> The pdf's file produce for filebad is in [1], and filegood in [2].
>
> This is the code for some tables:
> \documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
> \usepackage{nicematrix}
> \usepackage[version=4]{mhchem}
> \usepackage{booktabs}
> \usepackage{float}
> \begin{document}
>         \begin{table}[H]
>         \begin{NiceTabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
>         \CodeBefore
>         %\rowlistcolors{1}{red} % sólo la primer fila
>         \rowlistcolors{2}{red!15,blue!15}
>         \Body
>                 \toprule
>                 Isótopo & Nombre & $Z$ & $A$ & $p^{+}$ & $n$ &
> $e^{-}$\\\toprule
>                 \ce{^{80}_{35}Br} & & 35 & 80 & & & 35\\\midrule
>                 \ce{^{54}_{26}Fe} & & & & 26 & &\\\midrule
>                 \ce{^{204}_{82}Pb} & Plomo 204 & 82 & & 82 & & \\\midrule
>                 \ce{^{131}_{53}I} & & & & & & \\\midrule
>                 \ce{^{208}_{82}Pb} & & & 208 & & 126 & \\\midrule
>                 \ce{^{235}_{92}U} & Uranio 235 & & 235 & & & \\\bottomrule
>         \end{NiceTabular}
> \end{table}
> \end{document}
>
> If I compile only this, really good but in the filebad.tex not; and
> incredibly in the filegood.tex compile correctly. Really don't understand
> this behavior.
>
> I could share both full codes, they are a bit long and I have separate
> files, to see if someone can help me to find the error. I repeat both files
> have identical packages in use.
>
> Thanks a lot, apologies if it is not understood, but I do not understand
> these different behaviors.
> Darío
>
> [1] https://postimg.cc/vcM6x8Yh
> [2] https://postimg.cc/F7Zkyt14
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://tug.org/pipermail/texhax/attachments/20230908/9938449c/attachment.htm>