[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AFMs for Blue Sky CM/PS fonts...
Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> Its a shame the Blue Sky font set doesn't cover the same ground
> as the BaKoMa one. It means in practice that people have to have both
just out of curiosity, what are the differences?
(we're not going to make any more, but whatever we have will
be released, eventually, and this includes a partial AMS set.)
> The next edition TeX Live CD will have the fonts on, for what its
> worth, augmented by BaKoMa as needed (including AFMs from the latter)
thanks. imho, the "best effect" of the public availability
of these fonts is to make DVI a responsible format for publications
(and to allow PDF decent mathematics). technically, the hinting
is -quite- noticeable with a rendering engine at screen resolutions,
but irrelevant for print resolution. and, of course the BaKoMa fonts
are not freely distributable; wonder if that will change?