[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
large bigops
- To: math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk
- Subject: large bigops
- From: Justin Ziegler <ziegler@goofy.zdv.uni-mainz.de>
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 10:22:52 +0000
Could anybody give me some explanation for this:
\item Small versions of operators have a null height, whereas
big versions have a small height and a big depth:
\begin{verbatim}
(CHARACTER O 116
(COMMENT This is the small \bigotimes)
(CHARWD R 1.1111145)
(CHARDP R 1.000013)
(NEXTLARGER O 117)
)
(CHARACTER O 117
(COMMENT This is the big \bigotimes)
(CHARWD R 1.511116)
(CHARHT R 0.100001)
(CHARDP R 1.500012)
)
\end{verbatim}
THis is urgent.
JZ