[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new double sized operators:
- To: math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk
- Subject: Re: new double sized operators:
- From: alanje@cogs.susx.ac.uk (Alan Jeffrey)
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 23:47 BST
>Perhaps the shape of \oblong is fixed, but I think Dijkstra choice "looks
>remarkably like [ and ] glued together" simply because there was no other
>way of making one on a typewriter; I personally wouldn't object to having
>just the \oblong.
I think you're probably right about the origins of the shape of
<dijkstrachoice>, but the fact remains that the shape that is used in
most journal articles and books is as tall as a delimiter, and is very
narrow (about 3:1 aspect ratio I'd guess). It is a very different
looking glyph from <oblong>, and it is quite commonly used.
Alan.