TeX Development Fund - Grant Criteria
Like everything else, these criteria are subject to refinement and
change as the development fund evolves. As a starting point, though,
following are some items by which the Development Fund Committee is
guided in selecting grant recipients and amounts.
In addition to the expertise the committee members themselves may
bring to the grant review process, advisors may be consulted as needed.
Grant applications will be made as anonymous as possible before being
sent to an advisor.
- Project audience. The more people that a project benefits,
the better. But this is not to say that niche projects are not
fundable; indeed, one of our hopes for the development fund is that
projects which have been languishing may be revived and completed.
- Project feasibility. One consideration is the technical
question of whether the proposal can be accomplished; this is usually
not an issue. Large-scale multiple-year projects must be split into
year-long subprojects, for the sake of accounting and administration.
- Importance of funding. If the project will only happen with
a certain level of funding, then that is clearly a factor. On the other
hand, even if a project will continue due to volunteer effort (as most
projects do in the TeX world), that certainly does not disqualify it
from a grant.
- Conflict of interest. A committee member with a conflict of
interest for a given project (for example, if a member applies for a
grant) will not participate in the funding decision for that project.
Some substantial projects we'd be most pleased to see undertaken; see
also how to help the TeX community.
- Collaborative editing support in a TeX front end, such as TeXworks.
- Direct graphic support for more images in Dvips (jpg, tiff, etc.),
i.e., interpreting bmp: specials a la PCTeX, perhaps using the
- More free documentation. Much of the TeX system still has no
comprehensive free documentation.
- More math fonts. Only a few typefaces are
available, even commercially, for math typesetting. A Braille font
would be useful for the low-vision community.
- Page breaking: apply something like the same optimization to
breaking pages in the document as is done for breaking lines in a
paragraph. See Michael Plass' thesis Optimal pagination techniques for
automatic typesetting systems, Stefan Wohlfeil's “On the
pagination of complex documents”, Paolo Ciancarini et al.'s
“High-quality pagination for publishing” (SPE 42:6), and discussions
on texhax of the subject. Perhaps something can be done by having
TeX output the boxes in the log file with \showlists, and then writing a
separate program, as described in Jonathan Fine's article TeX Forever in
the EuroTeX 2005
proceedings. (Research level.)
- Line breaking: an extended implementation of TeX's algorithm was
implemented by Alex Holkner in his thesis
Global Multiple Objective Line Breaking,
as an approach to minimizing rivers, widows, hyphenations, and more
(hence the “multiple objective”). The “global”
is because he optimizes over the whole document, which could point
toward an implementation for page breaking, as above.
It is not at all necessary for projects to be this large to be
considered, though. Small projects are equally welcome.
$Date: 2019/03/21 22:16:32 $;
TeX development fund;