[XeTeX] strange difference

Jaxon Warner jaxonsaxon9 at gmail.com
Wed Jun 1 22:48:05 CEST 2022


UNSUBSCRIBE

On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 2:20 PM Zdenek Wagner <zdenek.wagner at gmail.com>
wrote:

> st 1. 6. 2022 v 19:40 odesílatel Apostolos Syropoulos via XeTeX
> <xetex at tug.org> napsal:
> >
> > >it may feel like a bug in this situation, but it is not, for the single
> > >reason that includegraphics cannot look inside the picture and decide
> > >which part of the picture is irrelevant. If you add a picture of some
> > >width and height, TeX makes sure it is completely inserted. If you turn
> > >it by an angle, TeX makes sure the whole of the picture is included and
> > >no corners are cut off. If TeX did otherwise, I would consider that a
> bug.
> >
> > Hi Julius,
> >
> > In different words: When I place an image in the middle of an A4 page,
> > the final PDF will be a A4 page but if turn the same image, the final
> > PDF will not fit inside an A4 page, right? The attached images are
> > generated from XeLaTeX sources that do not rely on the standalone
> > document class.
> >
> Hi,
>
> as Julius wrote, an imaga is a rectangle, thus the area needed for the
> rotated image can be calculated by a simple geometry. If you know that
> the corners do not contain anything, you should prepare a rotated and
> cropped image and include this instance.
>
> Zdeněk Wagner
> http://ttsm.icpf.cas.cz/team/wagner.shtml
>
>
> > Regards,
> >
> > Apostolos
> >
> > ----------------------
> > Apostolos Syropoulos
> > Xanthi, Greece
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20220601/e5b6db52/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: na.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 32364 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20220601/e5b6db52/attachment-0001.jpg>


More information about the XeTeX mailing list.