[XeTeX] Bidipoem Problem

[Vafa Khalighi]

Actually, this there is no issue for Persian users because they can use
xepersian which provides Persian equivalent of TeX primitives and also
Persian equivalents of many LaTeX commands and environments (This is heaps
more than what ConTeXt has done, you even can perform your macro programming
in Persian if you use xepersian since it also gives the Persian equivalents
of TeX primitives, for example if you use xepersian, instead \hbox you can
use \کادرا). The attached document is exactly the same document with the
difference that I have used xepersian and so Persian commands and
environments instead English ones.

فارسی را پاس بداریم

meaning: let's honour Persian.



On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) <
P.Taylor at rhul.ac.uk> wrote:

> Yes, you see what I see.  But surely the
>
>        <spaces>{footnote{
>
> cannot be correct ?  The backslash that should
> introduce "\footnote" has detached itself from
> the control word and re-inserted itself between
> <reversed interrogative> and the ?Arabic? text.
>
> ** Phil.
>
>
> Vafa Khalighi wrote:
>
>> The attached image is what TeXworks on my machine shows.
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20110622/40b2af7e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test.tex
Type: application/x-tex
Size: 557 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20110622/40b2af7e/attachment-0001.tex>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 10879 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20110622/40b2af7e/attachment-0001.pdf>