[XeTeX] No underdot in Adobe Garamond Pro?

[Rembrandt Wolpert]

I attach the test.tex that works for me (and the pdf which results). Note
that I had to explicitly load xunicode (without that it fails -- that's the
weird bit), and that I had to load polyglossia after the incantation for
xunicode and xltxtra. (I don't have a plain Garaond, so I subsituted
Garamond Premier Pr -- which reacts like the Adobe Garamond Pro -- addition
of xunicode and rearranged polyglossia)

as ever,
Rembrandt


On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:41, Ulrike Fischer <news3 at nililand.de> wrote:

> Am Wed, 6 May 2009 10:28:49 -0500 schrieb Rembrandt Wolpert:
>
> > xunicode seems to work (for me anyway) in that particular (Adobe Garamond
> > Pro) case, though.
>
> But as Shrisha is using xunicode (xltxtra loads xunicode) it seems
> not work for him/her. Did you try the example and compared the
> results?
>
>
> --
> Ulrike Fischer
>
> _______________________________________________
> XeTeX mailing list
> postmaster at tug.org
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
>



-- 
人有不為也而後可有為
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20090506/71c8f066/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test.tex
Type: application/x-tex
Size: 456 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20090506/71c8f066/attachment-0001.tex 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 14331 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20090506/71c8f066/attachment-0001.pdf