[XeTeX] CJK & fontspec
Will Robertson
wspr81 at gmail.com
Mon Mar 17 14:49:12 CET 2008
Hello,
Could people who actually do CJK typesetting let me know what features
they do and do not use in fontspec?
Also, there was a report a while back that the Vertical=RotatedGlyphs
feature (terrible name, in hindsight) is broken. Is this actually the
case? A note to myself in the fontspec source from August last year
claims that I fixed the problem, but I'm a bit confused. It also
applies the +vrt2 font feature...is this the right thing to do?
For fonts that support the older way of doing vertical typesetting
(+vert and so on, I believe), should I be detecting them and applying
a different set of features? This is all doable stuff, but I'm pretty
out of the loop with all of the CJK development.
Cheers,
Will
P.S. Should I change the Vertical feature to simply not take an
argument? This won't break backwards compatibility. But it does
preclude adding new features in there later...like, I don't know,
different stuff for Mongolian (or is it Tibetan?) that reads bottom-to-
top right-to-left or something. (Uh, don't anyone take offence at my
ignorance. It's past midnight and I'm hammering this out right before
bed.)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2415 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20080318/dae88395/attachment.bin
More information about the XeTeX
mailing list