[XeTeX] Correct LaTeX-logo – how?

Steve Peter speter at dandy.net
Mon May 8 23:44:55 CEST 2006

On May 8, 2006, at 12:59 PM, Adam Twardoch wrote:

> The form above shows a geometrically mirrored E from the same type  
> while
> the form below shows a properly-drawn "reversed E". Neither simple
> mirroring nor a 180 degree rotation of the E can produce a proper
> "reversed E" --

Although if you vertically flip the reversed E form as you have it in  
the top version, you end up with the right shape.

> the shape simply needs to be drawn by the type designer
> to produce a satisfactory result.

Or maybe not :-)

Admittedly, this won't work for all typefaces, so your point is still  


More information about the XeTeX mailing list