[XeTeX] Fontspec 1.8 problem?
will at guerilla.net.au
Sat Jul 16 12:09:14 CEST 2005
On 16 Jul 2005, at 7:21 PM, Ross Moore wrote:
> If you really want to override the existing definition,
> then isn't it a better fix to:
Well, I'm not sure. It would be a better idea, but I wasn't really
sure what was going with amsmath's definition:
Since the point of overwriting this in fontspec is \AtBeginDocument,
I didn't really want to override the effort that went into this macro...
So I figure anyone using \colon is *probably* using amsmath, and in
that case I wouldn't want fontspec changing their documents from how
they expect. The corollary to this being that the lucida maths setup
probably is being a little over-enthusiastic in providing macros for
its glyphs and anyone wanting a colon will be using instead:
Am I barking up the wrong tree?
More information about the XeTeX