# [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.99 released

Herbert Schulz herbs at wideopenwest.com
Thu Dec 8 21:39:52 CET 2005

On Dec 8, 2005, at 2:22 PM, Stephen Moye wrote:

> I changed:
>
> \def\V{:vertical} % for font defs
>
> to
>
> \def\V{/AAT:vertical} % for font defs
>
> and this seems to make no difference, both on 10.3.9 and 10.4.3
>
> [8>{
>
> SGM
>
>
> On Thursday, December 08, 2005, at 03:09PM, Jonathan Kew
> <jonathan_kew at sil.org> wrote:
>
>> On 8 Dec 2005, at 7:57 pm, Stephen Moye wrote:
>>
>>>  I can test this on 10.3.9 and 10.4.3 -- both systems seem to
>>> behave the same way in this matter.
>>>
>>>
>>> I hate to betray my ignorance (I ought to be used to it by new ;>})
>>> but when you say "using the /AAT qualifier", what do you mean? Do
>>> you mean:
>>>
>>> \font\test="fooboo/AAT:vertical" at 12 pt
>>
>> Yes, that would be it.... except I don't seem to have a font named
>> "fooboo", so that doesn't work for me. ;-)
>>
>> JK
>>

Howdy,

By making sure \Verticaltrue was un-commented I got vertical layout.
Didn't have to add the /AAT to the \V definition. This is with
10.4.3. Of course I have no idea why this works on my system or
doesn't work in Stephen's case.

Good Luck,

Herb Schulz
(herbs at wideopenwest.com)