[XeTeX] fontspec v1.1

[Bruno Voisin]

Le 19 oct. 04, à 08:39, Bruno Voisin a écrit :

> Le 19 oct. 04, à 04:37, Will Robertson a écrit :
>
>> Perhaps XU or XUCS would be a better idea --- "XeTeX Unicode", or 
>> something along those lines. Whom does one consult when creating new 
>> encoding names?
>
> There's the new [UTF8] option of {inputenc}, but I couldn't find it 
> documented inside 
> /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.tetex/doc/latex/base/inputenc.dvi (I'm 
> all speaking of TL2004, Gerben's new experimental setup still in beta 
> test). Looking inside 
> /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.tetex/tex/latex/base you find files 
> ot2enc.dfu, t2{a,b,c}enc.dfu, x2enc.dfu connected with UTF-8 encoding, 
> but I couldn't find inside utf8.def how their names are generated when 
> calling them, what relations the names OT2, T2 and X2 exactly bear to 
> UTF-8.
>
> So in summary I don't know which encoding name, if any, is supposed to 
> be associated with UTF-8 in standard LaTeX.

Silly me! It's fontenc of course, not inputenc, and it's documented 
inside fntguide.dvi, and all *2 encodings, like OT2, T2 and X2, are for 
cyrillic. So UTF8 seems to be the name for UTF-8 fonts. XU looks like a 
logical choice for XeTeX Unicode, especially since Jonathan mentioned 
repeatedly that XeTeX isn't limited to the UTF-8 subset of Unicode. But 
could it create confusion with XUL?

Bruno