[tlbuild] Questions about texlive source
Bruce Dubbs
bruce.dubbs at gmail.com
Sun Dec 4 00:12:05 CET 2011
Karl Berry wrote:
>> When I do the install from the tl-install script,
> FWIW, I am not aware of any script named "tl-install". LFS thing?
Typo, I meant your perl script install-tl.
>> The library below may be from ubuntu.
> I suspect it is. If you are building from our current sources, the
> libkpathsea version is 6.1.0 (dev).
We try to not build from development sources, but use released versions.
What I'm using right now is from ftp://tug.org/texlive/historic/2011,
specifically texlive-20110705-source.tar.xz and
texlive-20110705-texmf.tar.xz
>> Are all your binaries that use the libkpathsea and libptexenc
>> libraries built with the static version of the libraries?
> Yes. For the binaries we distribute with TL, shared libraries are
> useless.
> (Also, kpse has never been officially released as a shared library
> even though all the distros choose to use it that way.)
> I believe Peter (Breitenlohner) has made the build system support
> shared libraries if you use --enable-shared (and maybe other configure
> flags), but I've never tried it.
Right now I'm using
--prefix=/usr \
--disable-native-texlive-build \
--enable-shared \
--without-luatex \
--enable-mktextex-default \
--with-banner-add=" - BLFS" \
--without-x \
--disable-xdvipdfmx
But I'm still exploring.
> Peter also wrote quite a bit of information since the TL'11 release in
> new top-level README.distro, README.config, and other README.* files.
I see that. I'll study those and get back to you if there are more
questions.
Thanks for the response.
-- Bruce
More information about the tlbuild
mailing list