[tlbuild] tl09 build status

[Jukka Salmi]

Hello,

Karl Berry --> tlbuild (2009-06-01 19:30:11 -0500):
> Here's where we are with the TeX Live 2009 builds.
> 
> I think we are finally converging with the main sources.  I gather there
> will be updates for XeTeX and MetaPost soon, but it would be good to try
> a test build now, if you haven't in a while.  I expect to start asking
> for binaries to check in as soon as the above changes are in.  I have
> nothing else pending for the sources at this point.

building just succeeded on a NetBSD/i386 system; my local patches seem
no longer to be required.  Great!

Comparing what binaries were built today with the results of a build as
of 2009-02-20, I see the following differences:

$ ls -F i386-netbsd.20090220 >/tmp/tlbin.20090220 
$ ls -F i386-netbsd >/tmp/tlbin
$ comm -3 /tmp/tlbin.20090220 /tmp/tlbin
        afm2afm@
        autoinst@
        cmap2enc@
dmp*
dvipdfm*
        dvipdfm@
dvipdft*
dvitomp*
        dvitomp@
        font2afm@
        fragmaster@
lambda@
        luatangle*
makempx*
        man@
mfplain@
        mkt1font@
mpto*
newer*
odvips@
omega*
        ot2kpx@
oxdvi@
        pfm2kpx@
        pkfix-helper@
        purifyeps@
        showglyphs@
        splitindex@
        svn-multi@
        t1rawafm*
        texdirflatten@
        texloganalyser@
        ttfdump*
        ulqda@
        vpl2ovp@
        vpl2vpl@

Is this what should be expected?  Notice the `man' symlink (pointing to
`../../texmf/doc/man') in the new binary directory.  Is this correct?


Regards, Jukka

-- 
This email fills a much-needed gap in the archives.