different output for the same file
tkacvins at gmail.com
Fri Jun 4 20:23:19 CEST 2021
I admit to be out of the loop, but does the newer LaTeX/LuaTex/pdftex/XeTeX
handle GPOS table in OpenType
fonts? That might be a way around the issue, if those features exist. But
I am not sure if there is an OpenType
font that would meet Paulo's needs. There is always the STIX Fonts, but I
don't know if the vendor added a
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 1:39 PM David Carlisle <d.p.carlisle at gmail.com>
> pdflatex produces
> ! Package inputenc Error: Unicode character ̧ (U+0327)
> (inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX.
> as you have used the combining cedilla it;s hard, more or less impossible
> to do anything with combining characters in pdftex.
> luatex produces
> Missing character: There is no ̧ (U+0327) in font
> as latin modern doesn't have the combining cedilla either
> xelatex gives the same warning.
> On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 18:24, Paulo Ney de Souza <pauloney at gmail.com>
>> Would anyone shed some light why the MWE:
>> would produce different outputs between pdfLaTeX, xeLaTeX and luaLaTeX?
>> pdflatex: It does not process and outputs an error.
>> xelatex: Process silently and replace the a-ogonek by an "a".
>> lualatex: Process silently and replace the a-ogonek by an "a"+ space.
>> Paulo Ney
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the texhax