[texhax] lwarp package — Native LaTeX to HTMLconversion

[Kaveh Bazargan]

On 22 March 2016 at 04:47, Philip Taylor <P.Taylor at rhul.ac.uk> wrote:

>
>
> Reinhard Kotucha wrote:
>
> > Sure, tex4ht is in advantage because it's using TeX's parser.  What is
> > so impressive IMO is that now TeX files can be parsed properly by
> > another scripting language.
>
> Is this true, Reinhard ?  Can /any/ TeX file now be parsed properly by
> another scripting language, including (for example) those that change
> catcode on the fly, those that use \uppercase / \lowercase to perform
> "TeX magic" and so on, or only those (relatively simple) files that use
> only basic LaTeX markup ?
>
>
Phil, I wouldn't give it much chance of parsing your complex macros. From
what I remember even TeX struggles with those. ;-)



> ** Phil.
> _______________________________________________
> TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
> Mailing list archives: http://tug.org/pipermail/texhax/
> More links: http://tug.org/begin.html
>
> Automated subscription management: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/texhax
> Human mailing list managers: postmaster at tug.org
>



-- 
Kaveh Bazargan
Director
River Valley Technologies
@kaveh1000
+44 7771 824 111
www.rivervalleytechnologies.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/texhax/attachments/20160322/8f5b5ed9/attachment.html>