[texhax] TeX vs LaTeX primitives
Ulrike Fischer
news3 at nililand.de
Mon Dec 30 11:35:49 CET 2013
Am Mon, 30 Dec 2013 03:48:34 -0500 schrieb Victor Ivrii:
>> If you are using TeX primitives instead of LaTeX macros you certainly
>> lose parts of LaTeX's functionality.
> Reinhard's response raises in me 2 questions
> 1) In particular: I use very seldom hbox to avoid breakage of lines in
> multiline environment (f.e. in the title of the chapter) or for some other
> exotic reasons (example below) when everything else I tried failed. What
> one can do instead?
\mbox or \makebox. The second has an optional argument to set the
width and another to set the alignment: \makebox[0pt][l]{...}
For math there is also \mathllap, \mathmakebox etc from the
mathtools package.
> 2) How in general distinguish truly LaTeX macros?
By looking in the code or the documentation.
--
Ulrike Fischer
http://www.troubleshooting-tex.de/
More information about the texhax
mailing list