[texhax] Bibliographic HELP!

Alan T Litchfield alan at alphabyte.co.nz
Sun Oct 10 22:45:14 CEST 2010

OK, Sorry I misread the archive. My apologies.

Nevertheless, it pays to learn about bibtex and by deleting the note  
field all that extraneous bumph in the output will be gone :)


On 11/10/2010, at 9:35 AM, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
> Alan T Litchfield wrote:
>> David,
>> You are asking for someone to sort it out for you??
> No, David is offering to pay someone to sort it out,
> or to make a donation to TUG [1].  Both of those seem
> very reasonable to me, and I would offer to help
> myself if I knew the first thing about BibTeX.
> Philip Taylor
> --------
> [1]
>> Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 16:58:36 +0100
>> Message-ID: <AANLkTikRBANqnyW3MbjoP-xN+chjRkKQ4syydoeWZ+96 at mail.gmail.com 
>> >
>> From: David Lumsden <lumsdenda at gmail.com>
>> To: support at tug.org
>> I've enquired on here for advice on how to fix my referencing on  
>> latex to yield the preferred vancouver style I wish and not to  
>> include the 'note' field in my finished references. As I am not a  
>> programmer of any sort I am struggling to fix the error using  
>> advice from people, I am hoping to know if there is anyone  
>> qualified that I would be able to send my template document to, who  
>> may be able to correct the error for me. I realise this may take up  
>> some time and of course I would happily pay a fee to a trusted  
>> service or indeed give a donation to TUG.
>> I hope this spikes some interest.
>> Kind regards, David.

More information about the texhax mailing list