[texhax] why not floating-point?
Pavel Minev Penev
pavpen at berkeley.edu
Thu Sep 16 21:21:26 CEST 2004
В деня четвъртък, 16. от септември, 2004 в 13:26:30 GMT -0400, Barbara Beeton мислил:
> What about adding floating-point arithmetic support to TeX?
>
> perhaps it could be considered for an extension to a
> tex successor. but it will never be added to tex
> itself. when tex was implemented on multiple platforms,
> it was demonstrated that the floating-point arithmentic
> was seriously not the same on all platforms, hence the
> decision to use only a very fine-grained fixed-point
> mechanism. perhaps the situation has changed now, and
> floating point is (more) uniform. but that would need
> to be demonstrated, to ensure platform independence.
>
> Motivation: I understand that the main obstacle to implementing truly
> powerful graphic routines directly via TeX is that TeX cannot handle
> floating-point arithmetics. While various external tricks are
> wonderful, they seem a bit unstable (eg the beauty of PostScripting via
> packages like eepic, that suddenly becomes unavailable when switching
> to pdfTeX).
>
> a worthy goal, but it doesn't outweigh the original
> motivation, which strongly affects the positioning of
> letters in a line of type or symbols in a built-up
> equation.
>
> in any event, tex itself is frozen, so this is a
> topic for a successor.
See the fp package for fixed-point,
--
Pav http://www.larouchepub.com/eirtoc/2004/eirtoc_3125.html
,., http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Frankfurt_School&oldid=4862683
,``:'', http://www.bilderberg.org/ccf.htm
{o ! o} http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabian_Society
] -+- [ http://bss.sfsu.edu/fischer/IR%20360/Readings/Readings.htm
\ ! / http://www.againsttcpa.com/ http://swpat.ffii.org/ My type: Dvorak.
`-'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._foreign_interventions_since_1945
`shell$ gpg --keyserver x-hkp://search.keyserver.net:11371 --recv-key 164C028F`
More information about the texhax
mailing list