[tex4ht] Choice of LaTeX -> *ml method for all browsers?

[Karl Berry]

    Can the html that is produced be configured to preferentially
    deliver everything complicated graphically?

I'm under the impression that the simple  htlatex abc  should produce
abc.html with bitmap math.

    My attempts at using "htlatex test" produce html devoid of
    graphic inclusions for some reason, and the use of "mk4th
    htlatex test.tex" results in the message:
     "! I can't find file `.cfg'."

Sorry, doesn't sound familiar.  All that comes to mind offhand is to try
looking in the .log file.

    any further advice you could give or references you might suggest? 

Eitan's intro article:
http://tug.org/TUGboat/Articles/tb25-1/gurari.pdf

Eitan's detailed documentation:
http://tug.org/applications/tex4ht/

Eitan's documentation and sources are not the easiest to read (at least
not for me), but he did provide a wealth of information.  Takes time to
digest, for sure.

Hope this helps,
Karl