[tex4ht-commits] [SCM] tex4ht updated: r848 - trunk/lit

[michal_h21 at gnu.org.ua]

Author: michal_h21
Date: 2020-11-27 15:12:54 +0200 (Fri, 27 Nov 2020)
New Revision: 848

Modified:
   trunk/lit/ChangeLog
   trunk/lit/tex4ht-ooffice.tex
Log:
Don't disable footcite support for Biblatex-dw

Modified: trunk/lit/ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- trunk/lit/ChangeLog	2020-11-26 22:45:07 UTC (rev 847)
+++ trunk/lit/ChangeLog	2020-11-27 13:12:54 UTC (rev 848)
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2020-11-27  Michal Hoftich  <michal.h21 at gmail.com>
+
+	* tex4ht-ooffice.tex (ooffice.4ht): don't remove footcite support for
+	Biblatex-dw.
+	https://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/bugs/index.php?492
+
 2020-11-26  Michal Hoftich  <michal.h21 at gmail.com>
 
 	* tex4ht-4ht.tex (csquotes.4ht),

Modified: trunk/lit/tex4ht-ooffice.tex
===================================================================
--- trunk/lit/tex4ht-ooffice.tex	2020-11-26 22:45:07 UTC (rev 847)
+++ trunk/lit/tex4ht-ooffice.tex	2020-11-27 13:12:54 UTC (rev 848)
@@ -3071,12 +3071,17 @@
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%
 
 \<configure ooffice footnote-dw\><<<
-\protected\long\def\mkfootnotecite#1{#1}
 >>>
 
+% There used to be the following redefinition:
+% \protected\long\def\mkfootnotecite#1{#1}
+% I don't know what was the reasoning, but
+% footnote citing works well with the current 
+% Biblatex and TeX4ht, so I think we can remove it.
 
 
 
+
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 \section{List-Based Environments}
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%