[tex-live] TL 2009 not installing URW Garamond ?
daleif at imf.au.dk
Mon Oct 12 13:55:37 CEST 2009
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
> Robin Fairbairns wrote:
>> sigh. strangely enough, we didn't search every file on ctan (cs. 12k of
>> them) when we did away with the nonfree tree.
>> mind you, i'm not sure the urw fonts ever were on nonfree (and i'm not
>> about to search the transaction history to find out).
> OK, but it was a serious question : how is one supposed to know
> that CTAN (in its infinite wisdom) has classified URW Garamond
> as non-free ? If, for example, I visit the TeX Catalogue and
> search for Garamond, I find it included in the Free_Math_Font_Survey.
> Furthermore, if I follow the link to Licences and then back
> to the Sarovar version of the Catalogue, and use the
> A-Z Index to find URW Garamond, I read
> "This bundle provides a set of Adobe Type-1 fonts which URW has made
> available for free under the Aladdin Free Public License:"
> So where /is/ the information that CTAN has classified URW Garamond
> as "non-free", and given the above quotation, on what basis was
> this decision made ?
> ** Phil.
or the problem is that the license is not compatible with the debian
rules, and thus cannot be included directly in TL. That has nothing to
do with CTAN.
More information about the tex-live