[tex-live] should lh depend on ecrm?
Ivan Shmakov
ivan at theory.asu.ru
Thu Sep 25 02:39:41 CEST 2008
>>>>> Ulrike Fischer <news2 at nililand.de> writes:
[...]
>> Shouldn't there be a
>> depend ecrm
>> line in texlive.tlpdb, below `name lh' then?
>> (I'm completely unfamiliar with the TeX Live packaging, but I've
>> thought that it's exactly the way to inform, e. g., tlmgr to install
>> ecrm in case lh is requested?)
> No idea. But I have some doubts that such a system could be managed
> as almost every package loads (and so depends on) other
> packages.
Well, Debian GNU/Linux has about 18000 packages to watch over...
> miktex use some sort of trigger system: If during a compilation a
> file is missing it looks up in its list of packages if there is one
> which contains the file and then installs it.
It's much less trouble for ELF, though, since binaries contain
lists of the libraries they depend on.
A tool that performs a minimal installation and then tries every
package to correctly install and to perform correctly (running
some package-specific tests, e. g., trying to typeset a sample
document using the package; building documentation may serve as
a test) may be useful.
More information about the tex-live
mailing list