[tex-live] Re: debian packages ready

[Norbert Preining]

On Die, 19 Jul 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> > should alternatively depend on preview-tetex, which is a saner name.
> 
> Why should it be renamed to preview-tetex?  It has nothing to do with

Thanks Frank. I seems to me that there is a fundamental misunderstanding
about Debian Packages vs. upstream distribution systems. Naturally, I
cannot add anything to the words of a DD, as I am only a simple user
trying to make debs.

> I'd say.  preview-latex-styles is not so bad after all, (la)tex-preview
> could be an alternative.

For now we have preview-latex-style, if this changes, we can of course
change the Suggests to the new name, including acutex.

Best wishes

Norbert

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining AT logic DOT at>             Università di Siena
sip:preining at at43.tuwien.ac.at                             +43 (0) 59966-690018
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094      fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCREGGAN (n. banking)
The crossed-out bit caused by people putting the wrong year on their
cheques all through January.
			--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff