texlive[61856] Master/texmf-dist: mathtools (2feb22)
commits+karl at tug.org
commits+karl at tug.org
Wed Feb 2 22:40:29 CET 2022
Revision: 61856
http://tug.org/svn/texlive?view=revision&revision=61856
Author: karl
Date: 2022-02-02 22:40:29 +0100 (Wed, 02 Feb 2022)
Log Message:
-----------
mathtools (2feb22)
Modified Paths:
--------------
trunk/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/mathtools/README.md
trunk/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/mathtools/empheq.pdf
trunk/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/mathtools/mathtools.pdf
trunk/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/mathtools/mhsetup.pdf
trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/mathtools/empheq.dtx
trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/mathtools/empheq.ins
trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/mathtools/mathtools.dtx
trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/mathtools/mathtools.ins
trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/mathtools/mhsetup.dtx
trunk/Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/mathtools/mathtools.sty
Added Paths:
-----------
trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/mathtools/mhsetup.ins
Modified: trunk/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/mathtools/README.md
===================================================================
--- trunk/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/mathtools/README.md 2022-02-02 21:40:02 UTC (rev 61855)
+++ trunk/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/mathtools/README.md 2022-02-02 21:40:29 UTC (rev 61856)
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
Copyright (C) 2002-2011 Morten Hoegholm
Copyright (C) 2012-2019 Lars Madsen
-Copyright (C) 2020 Lars Madsen, The LaTeX3 Project
+Copyright (C) 2020- Lars Madsen, The LaTeX3 Project
<https://latex-project.org/>
All rights reserved.
Modified: trunk/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/mathtools/empheq.pdf
===================================================================
(Binary files differ)
Modified: trunk/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/mathtools/mathtools.pdf
===================================================================
(Binary files differ)
Modified: trunk/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/mathtools/mhsetup.pdf
===================================================================
(Binary files differ)
Modified: trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/mathtools/empheq.dtx
===================================================================
--- trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/mathtools/empheq.dtx 2022-02-02 21:40:02 UTC (rev 61855)
+++ trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/mathtools/empheq.dtx 2022-02-02 21:40:29 UTC (rev 61856)
@@ -438,8 +438,8 @@
% \subsection{Using the \env{empheq} environment}
%
% The package defines a single environment
-% \SpecialEnvIndex{empheq}\env{empheq} and the usage is kind of straight
-% forward:
+% \SpecialEnvIndex{empheq}\env{empheq} and the usage is kind of
+% straightforward:
% \begin{codesyntax}
% |\begin{empheq}|\oarg{markup instructions}\marg{\AmS{} env_name}\\
% \mbox{}\quad\meta{contents of \AmS{} environment}\\
@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@
% E&=mc^2 + \int_a^a x\, dx
% \end{empheq}
% Maybe not the most impressive example, but as you can see the
-% contents of the environment is exactly the same as for the regular
+% contents of the environment are exactly the same as for the regular
% \env{align*} evironment from \pkg{amsmath}. The rest of the \AmS{}
% environments are chosen the same way by typing the name as the
% mandatory argument of \env{empheq} with the exception of the
@@ -572,7 +572,7 @@
% \end{codesyntax}
% The key \key{box} specifies the kind of box you would like to put
% around the display. It can be any kind of box, as long as the
-% contents of the box is situated on the baseline like in a
+% contents of the box are situated on the baseline like in a
% \fbox{\cs{fbox}}.
% \begin{verbatim}
% \begin{empheq}[box=\fbox]{align}
@@ -614,7 +614,7 @@
% this manual features centered math displays.} you may want the
% math display and not the outer box to align at the left margin (or
% rather: the indentation). If you make sure the contents of the
-% outer box is centered horizontally inside the box, \key{marginbox}
+% outer box are centered horizontally inside the box, \key{marginbox}
% will align it properly. You shouldn't set both \key{box} and
% \key{marginbox} at the same time, as this is surely not what you
% want and the package will silently use the last one in the list.
@@ -762,7 +762,7 @@
% versions prior to and including~0.7e. If you have documents produced
% with versions prior to~0.7e, then you have to load the package
% \pkg{empheq07} instead. \pkg{empheq07} now exists as a separate package
-% package with its own documentation, but I strongly recommend switching
+% with its own documentation, but I strongly recommend switching
% to the new version because it is so much better.
%
% \subsection{Package options}
@@ -802,7 +802,7 @@
% \opt{ntheorem} option. In order for this to work properly, an
% \pkg{amsmath} bug\footnote{See the \LaTeX{} Bugs Database
% \url{http://www.latex-project.org/cgi-bin/ltxbugs2html} under
-% \AmS\LaTeX{} problem report 3624.} is fixed. For more information
+% \AmS-\LaTeX{} problem report 3624.} is fixed. For more information
% on this option see \S \vref{sec:ntheorem-support}.
%
% \subsubsection{Using \env{multline}}
@@ -930,7 +930,7 @@
% for the pseudo environment |\[ ... \]| (it's not really an
% environment), \footnote{With the option \opt{oldmultline} the
% \env{multline} and \env{multline*} environments aren't supported
-% either because their syntax in \pkg{empheq} then differ from their
+% either because their syntax in \pkg{empheq} then differs from their
% syntax in \pkg{amsmath}.} because a)~you don't really need markup
% instructions for a one line display, and b)~would you really like
% a syntax like
@@ -937,7 +937,7 @@
% \begin{verbatim}
% \[[box=\fbox] a=b \]
% \end{verbatim}
-% where its difficult to see whether or not there is a typo?
+% where it's difficult to see whether or not there is a typo?
% Choosing \opt{overload} is meant for people who don't want to
% change their entire document into \pkg{empheq} syntax. I have no
% problems with that; just be careful when you fiddle with
@@ -1089,7 +1089,7 @@
% packages where \pkg{empheq} has to provide workarounds and they
% can be divided into two categories.
% \begin{description}
-% \item[Compatibility] Some packages affect \LaTeX' labelling
+% \item[Compatibility] Some packages affect \LaTeX's labelling
% mechanism and since \pkg{empheq} internally has to turn off
% labels and related code temporarily, hooks must be provided for
% these packages. Examples of such packages are \pkg{hyperref} and
@@ -1184,7 +1184,7 @@
% be lost. In the future \pkg{ntheorem} should be able to test for
% this and add \verb|\usetagform{default}| automatically.
%
-% Users who use \verb|\usetagform| to get another tag design, should
+% Users who use \verb|\usetagform| to get another tag design should
% make sure to postpone this configuration until \emph{after} loading
% \pkg{ntheorem}.
%
@@ -1270,7 +1270,7 @@
%
% The good news is that this is where \pkg{empheq} sets in.
% Basically all you need to do is to use the \env{empheq}
-% environment to type set your equations inside the theorem
+% environment to typeset your equations inside the theorem
% environments:
% \begin{verbatim}
% \begin{Theorem}
@@ -1346,7 +1346,7 @@
% sub-formula inside the \cs{left}-\cs{right} pair is to be
% vertically centered and given its height $h_1$ and its depth $h_2$
% we want to produce a delimiter with total height $h$, where $h =
-% 2 \max(h_1,h_2)$. \TeX' rules on this is that the minimum
+% 2 \max(h_1,h_2)$. \TeX's rules on this are that the minimum
% delimiter size $h_{\min}$ must meet the requirements
% \[
% h_{\min}\geq h \frac{f}{1000} \quad\land \quad h_{\min}\geq h-\delta
@@ -1437,7 +1437,7 @@
%
% \subsection{About \texorpdfstring{$\cs{eqref}$}{\textbackslash eqref}}
%
-% Internally \env{empheq} separate the displayed math from
+% Internally \env{empheq} separates the displayed math from
% the corresponding equation numbers such that we can add special
% delimiters or boxes. This is done by nullifying (or rather
% conveniently redefining) an internal command called
@@ -1709,7 +1709,7 @@
% \bibitem{fancybox}
% Timothy Van Zandt,
% \emph{The \pkg{fancybox} package} Version 1.3,
-% 2000/09/19
+% 2000/09/19.
% (Available from CTAN as file \texttt{fancybox.sty}.)
%
% \bibitem{Raht03}
@@ -1728,19 +1728,19 @@
% \changes{v1.06}{2004/03/13}{Added \pkg{calc} to the \refname}
% \bibitem{Thorup:calc:1998}
% Kresten~Krab Thorup, Frank Jensen, and Chris Rowley.
-% \emph{The {\pkg{calc}} package}, Version 4.1b, 1998/07/07,
+% \emph{The {\pkg{calc}} package}, Version 4.1b, 1998/07/07.
% (Available from CTAN as file \texttt{calc.dtx}.)
%
% \bibitem{ntheorem}
% Wolfgang May and Andreas Schlechte,
% \emph{The \pkg{ntheorem} package} Version 1.203,
-% 2002/01/07,
+% 2002/01/07.
% (Available from CTAN as file \texttt{ntheorem.dtx}.)
%
% \changes{v2.10}{2004/07/26}{Added \pkg{showkeys} to the \refname}
% \bibitem{Carlisle:showkeys:1997}
% David Carlisle. \emph{The {\pkg{showkeys}} package}, v3.12,
-% 1997/06/12, (Available from CTAN as file \texttt{showkeys.dtx}.)
+% 1997/06/12. (Available from CTAN as file \texttt{showkeys.dtx}.)
%
% \end{thebibliography}
%
Modified: trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/mathtools/empheq.ins
===================================================================
--- trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/mathtools/empheq.ins 2022-02-02 21:40:02 UTC (rev 61855)
+++ trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/mathtools/empheq.ins 2022-02-02 21:40:29 UTC (rev 61856)
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
\input docstrip.tex
\Msg{************************************************************************}
\Msg{* Installation}
-\Msg{* Package: empheq 2017/03/31 v2.15 empheq}
+\Msg{* Package: empheq 2020/03/24 v2.16 empheq}
\Msg{************************************************************************}
\keepsilent
Modified: trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/mathtools/mathtools.dtx
===================================================================
--- trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/mathtools/mathtools.dtx 2022-02-02 21:40:02 UTC (rev 61855)
+++ trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/mathtools/mathtools.dtx 2022-02-02 21:40:29 UTC (rev 61856)
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
%
% Copyright (C) 2004-2011 by Morten Hoegholm
% Copyright (C) 2012-2019 by Lars Madsen
-% Copyright (C) 2020 by Lars Madsen, The LaTeX3 team
+% Copyright (C) 2020- by Lars Madsen, The LaTeX3 team
%
% This work may be distributed and/or modified under the
% conditions of the LaTeX Project Public License, either
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@
%<*driver>
\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}
\ProvidesFile{mathtools.drv}%
- [2021/04/12 v1.27 mathematical typesetting tools]
+ [2022/02/02 v1.28 mathematical typesetting tools]
\documentclass{ltxdoc}
\IfFileExists{fourier.sty}{\usepackage{fourier}}{}
@@ -239,6 +239,7 @@
}
+
\expandafter\def\expandafter\MakePrivateLetters\expandafter{%
\MakePrivateLetters \catcode`\_=11\relax
}
@@ -294,6 +295,16 @@
\def\theindex{\MTtheindex\MakePrivateLetters}
+\NewDocumentCommand\Framebox{ o O{c} m }{%
+ \IfNoValueTF{#1}{%
+ \framebox{\footnotesize\strut #3}%
+ }{%
+ \framebox[#1][#2]{\footnotesize\strut #3}%
+ }%
+}
+
+
+
%\usepackage[draft]{fixme}
%\fxsetup{
% multiuser,
@@ -322,7 +333,7 @@
%
% \GetFileInfo{mathtools.drv}
%
-% \CheckSum{3529}
+% \CheckSum{3581}
%
% \title{The \pkg{mathtools} package\thanks{This file has version number
% \fileversion, last revised \filedate.}}
@@ -335,7 +346,7 @@
% \begin{abstract}
% \noindent The \pkg{mathtools} package is an extension package to
% \pkg{amsmath}. There are two things on \pkg{mathtools}' agenda:
-% (1)~correct various bugs/defeciencies in \pkg{amsmath} until
+% (1)~correct various bugs/deficiencies in \pkg{amsmath} until
% these are fixed by the \AmS{} and (2)~provide useful tools
% for mathematical typesetting, be it a small macro for
% typesetting a prescript or an underbracket, or entirely new
@@ -400,7 +411,7 @@
% The option \opt{fixamsmath} (default) fixes two bugs in
% \pkg{amsmath}.\footnote{See the online \LaTeX{} bugs database
% \url{http://www.latex-project.org/cgi-bin/ltxbugs2html} under
-% \AmS\LaTeX{} problem reports 3591 and 3614.} Should you for some
+% \AmS-\LaTeX{} problem reports 3591 and 3614.} Should you for some
% reason not want to fix these bugs then just add the option
% \opt{donotfixamsmathbugs} (if you can do it without typos). The
% reason for this extremely long name is that I really don't see why
@@ -553,7 +564,7 @@
% \endgroup
% Notice how the limit of the right summation sign is typeset in a
% more compact style than the left. It is because \TeX{} sets the
-% limits of operators in a \emph{cramped} style. For each of \TeX'
+% limits of operators in a \emph{cramped} style. For each of \TeX's
% four math styles (\cs{displaystyle}, \cs{textstyle},
% \cs{scriptstyle}, and \cs{scriptscriptstyle}), there also exists a
% cramped style that doesn't raise exponents as much. Besides in the
@@ -560,7 +571,7 @@
% limits of operators, \TeX{} also automatically uses these cramped
% styles in radicals such as \cs{sqrt} and in the denominators of
% fractions, but unfortunately there are no primitive commands that
-% allows you to detect crampedness or switch to it.
+% allow you to detect crampedness or switch to it.
%
% \pkg{mathtools} offers the command \cs{cramped} which forces a
% cramped style in normal un-cramped math. Additionally you can
@@ -594,7 +605,7 @@
% \end{quote}
% Typesetting on a grid is generally considered quite desirable, but
% as the second line of the example shows, the exponents of $2$
-% causes the line to be too tall for the normal value of
+% cause the line to be too tall for the normal value of
% \cs{baselineskip}, so \TeX{} inserts a \cs{lineskip} (normal value
% is \the\lineskip). In order to circumvent the problem, we can
% force a cramped style so that the exponents aren't raised as much:
@@ -785,7 +796,7 @@
% \label{sec:swapping}
%
% One feature that the plain old \env{equation} environment has that
-% the \AmS\ environments does not (because of technical reasons), is
+% the \AmS\ environments do not (because of technical reasons) is
% the feature of using less space above the equation if the situation
% presents itself. The \AmS\ environments cannot do this, but one can
% manually, using
@@ -822,7 +833,7 @@
%
% In this section various tools for altering the appearance of tags
% are shown. All of the tools here can be used at any point in the
-% document but they should probably be affect the whole document, so
+% document but they should probably affect the whole document, so
% the preamble is the best place to issue them.
%
% \subsubsection{The appearance of tags}
@@ -896,6 +907,13 @@
% \SpecialKeyIndex{showmanualtags}$\key{showmanualtags}=\texttt{true}\vert\texttt{false}$\\
% \SpecialUsageIndex{\refeq}\cs{refeq}\marg{label}
% \end{codesyntax}
+% First of, one should always use \cs{eqref} when referring to
+% equation numbers. When \opt{showonlyrefs} is true, we monitor
+% \cs{eqref}\marg{label}, and those used will get an equation number,
+% whereas those not used will not. Note: We do \emph{not} monitor the
+% normal \cs{ref} command! See the follow paragraph for situations
+% for what to do when \cs{eqref} cannot be used to refer to the equation.
+%
% An equation where the tag is produced with a manual \cs{tag*}
% shouldn't be referenced with the normal \cs{eqref} because that
% would format it according to the current tag format. Using just
@@ -994,8 +1012,8 @@
% \cs{ref}.
%
% \medskip\noindent\textbf{BUG 1:} Unfortunately the use of the
-% \key{showonlyref} introduce a bug within amsmath's typesetting
-% of formula versus equation number. This bug manifest itself by
+% \key{showonlyref} introduces a bug within amsmath's typesetting
+% of formula versus equation number. This bug manifests itself by
% allowing formulas to be typeset close to or over the equation
% number. Currently no general fix is known, other than making sure
% that one's formulas are not long enough to touch the equation
@@ -1007,7 +1025,7 @@
% number is recorded such that the formula or the equation number can
% be moved (if necessary) in the typesetting part. When
% \key{showonlyref} is enabled, the width of the equation number
-% depend on whether or not this number is referred~to. To determine
+% depends on whether or not this number is referred~to. To determine
% this, we need to know the current label. But the current label is
% \emph{not} known in the measuring phase. Thus the measured width is
% always zero (because no label equals not referred to) and therefore
@@ -1019,7 +1037,7 @@
% \pkg{ntheorem} option \key{thmmarks} is active. The shown equation
% numbers may come out wrong (seems to be multiplied by 2). Or the end
% marker may be placed in the wrong place if a proof ends with a
-% displayed formula, and that formula is not refered to.
+% displayed formula, and that formula is not referred to.
%
% There are two possible solutions to this both involving \pkg{empheq}.
% The easiest fix is to add the following line
@@ -1029,7 +1047,7 @@
% before loading \pkg{ntheorem}. But the \texttt{overload} option of
% course disables things like \cs{intertext} and \cs{shotintertext}.
%
-% The other thing to try is to use drop the \texttt{overload} option
+% The other thing to try is to drop the \texttt{overload} option
% and use \env{empheq} on the very last expression, as in
% \begin{verbatim}
% \begin{empheq}{align}
@@ -1125,11 +1143,23 @@
% \cs{xLeftrightarrow} we added a space to the argument(s), making
% the arrow slightly longer and moving the argument away from the
% large arrow head.
-%
-%
%
+% \begin{codesyntax}
+% \SpecialUsageIndex{\xlongrightarrow}
+% \cs{xlongrightarrow}\oarg{sub}\marg{sup}\texttt{~~~~}
+% \SpecialUsageIndex{\xlongleftarrow}
+% \cs{xlongleftarrow}\oarg{sub}\marg{sup}\texttt{~~~~}
+% \end{codesyntax}
+% \FeatureRequest{rbrito {\footnotesize (issue \#12)}}{added 2022}%
+% Similar to \cs{xright/leftarrow} but based on the \emph{long}
+% versions. For short arguments it stays the same length as the
+% \cs{long...} base arrow.
+% \begin{align*}
+% A & \longrightarrow B & A & \longleftarrow B \\
+% A & \xlongrightarrow[b]{a} B & A & \xlongleftarrow[b]{a} B \\
+% A & \xlongrightarrow[below]{above} B & A & \xlongleftarrow[below]{above} B \\
+% \end{align*}
%
-%
% \subsubsection{Braces and brackets}
%
% \LaTeX{} defines other kinds of extensible symbols like
@@ -1205,13 +1235,13 @@
% As \cs{overbrace} has the exact same problems, there are good
% reasons for \pkg{mathtools} to make redefinitions of
% \cs{underbrace} and \cs{overbrace}. These new versions work
-% equally well in all font sizes and fixes the spacing issues and
+% equally well in all font sizes and fix the spacing issues and
% apart from working with the default Computer Modern fonts, they
% also work with the packages \pkg{mathpazo}, \pkg{pamath},
% \pkg{fourier}, \pkg{eulervm}, \pkg{cmbright}, and \pkg{mathptmx}.
% If you use the \pkg{ccfonts} to get the full Concrete fonts, the
% original version saved under the names \cs{LaTeXunderbrace} and
-% \cs{LaTeXoverbrace} are better, due to of the special design of
+% \cs{LaTeXoverbrace} is better, due to the special design of
% the Concrete extensible braces. In that case you should probably
% just add the lines
% \begin{verbatim}
@@ -1270,7 +1300,7 @@
% type valid in the usual \env{array} environment.
%
% While we are at it, we also provide fenced versions of the
-% \env{smallmatrix} environment, To keep up with the naming of the
+% \env{smallmatrix} environment. To keep up with the naming of the
% large matrix environments, we provide both a starred and a
% non-starred version. Since \env{smallmatrix} is defined in a
% different manner than the \env{matrix} environment, the option to
@@ -1322,9 +1352,9 @@
% the default is \cs{,}.
%
% As an extra trick the fences will behave as open and closing fences
-% in constract to their auto-scaling nature.\footnote{\cs{left} and
+% despite their auto-scaling nature.\footnote{\cs{left} and
% \cs{right} creates an \emph{inner} construction, and not as one
-% might expect something where a preceeding \cs{sin} sees an opening
+% might expect something where a preceding \cs{sin} sees an opening
% fence, thus the space before or after may be too large. Inside this
% construction they behave.}
%
@@ -1358,19 +1388,21 @@
% right and preceded by a hard space of size \key{lastline-preskip}.
% Both these hard spaces have a default value of \cs{multlinegap}.
% Here we use a `t' in the first optional argument denoting a
-% top-aligned building block (the default is `c').
+% top-aligned building block (the default is `c').\footnote{The helper macro
+% \cs{Framebox}\marg{...} is equivalent to
+% \cs{framebox}\marg{\cs{footnotesize}\cs{strut} ...}}
% \begin{verbatim}
% \[
% A = \begin{multlined}[t]
-% \framebox[4cm]{first} \\
-% \framebox[4cm]{last}
+% \Framebox[4cm]{first} \\
+% \Framebox[4cm]{last}
% \end{multlined} B
% \]
% \end{verbatim}
% \[
% A = \begin{multlined}[t]
-% \framebox[4cm]{first} \\
-% \framebox[4cm]{last}
+% \Framebox[4cm]{first} \\
+% \Framebox[4cm]{last}
% \end{multlined} B
% \]
% Note also that \env{multlined} gives you access to an extended
@@ -1379,25 +1411,25 @@
% \begin{verbatim}
% \[
% \begin{multlined}
-% \framebox[.65\columnwidth]{First line} \\
-% \framebox[.5\columnwidth]{Second line} \\
+% \Framebox[.65\columnwidth]{First line} \\
+% \Framebox[.5\columnwidth]{Second line} \\
% \shoveleft{L+E+F+T} \\
% \shoveright{R+I+G+H+T} \\
% \shoveleft[1cm]{L+E+F+T} \\
% \shoveright[\widthof{$R+I+G+H+T$}]{R+I+G+H+T} \\
-% \framebox[.65\columnwidth]{Last line}
+% \Framebox[.65\columnwidth]{Last line}
% \end{multlined}
% \]
% \end{verbatim}
% \[
% \begin{multlined}
-% \framebox[.65\columnwidth]{First line} \\
-% \framebox[.5\columnwidth]{Second line} \\
+% \Framebox[.65\columnwidth]{First line} \\
+% \Framebox[.5\columnwidth]{Second line} \\
% \shoveleft{L+E+F+T} \\
% \shoveright{R+I+G+H+T} \\
% \shoveleft[1cm]{L+E+F+T} \\
% \shoveright[\widthof{$R+I+G+H+T$}]{R+I+G+H+T} \\
-% \framebox[.65\columnwidth]{Last line}
+% \Framebox[.65\columnwidth]{Last line}
% \end{multlined}
% \]
%
@@ -1406,15 +1438,15 @@
% \begin{verbatim}
% \[
% \begin{multlined}[b][7cm]
-% \framebox[4cm]{first} \\
-% \framebox[4cm]{last}
+% \Framebox[4cm]{first} \\
+% \Framebox[4cm]{last}
% \end{multlined} = B
% \]
% \end{verbatim}
% \[
% \begin{multlined}[b][7cm]
-% \framebox[4cm]{first} \\
-% \framebox[4cm]{last}
+% \Framebox[4cm]{first} \\
+% \Framebox[4cm]{last}
% \end{multlined} = B
% \]
% There can be two optional arguments (position and width) and
@@ -1428,7 +1460,7 @@
% not work as expected. The implementation contains an `invisible'
% line after the first \env{multline} row, inside an \env{array} this
% line is no longer `invisible' because \env{array} sets
-% \cs{baselineskip} to zero. Currently we have no general workaround
+% \cs{baselineskip} to zero. We have no general workaround
% for this.
%
% \medskip\noindent
@@ -1435,7 +1467,7 @@
% \textbf{Bug 2:}
% \CommentAdded{2015/11/12}
% Due to the way \env{multlined} is implemented, certain
-% constructions does not work inside \env{multlined}. We have added a
+% constructions do not work inside \env{multlined}. We have added a
% hook (\cs{MultlinedHook}) that can be added to. The default value
% is a fix for \env{subarray} and \env{crampedsubarray} and thus for
% \cs{substack} and \cs{crampedsubstack} (and a few others, thus add
@@ -1484,7 +1516,7 @@
% \cs{end}\arg{cases*}
% \end{codesyntax}
% \FeatureRequest{Lars Madsen}{2004/07/01}
-% Anyone who have tried to use an integral in the regular
+% Anyone who has tried to use an integral in the regular
% \env{cases} environment from \pkg{amsmath} will have noticed that
% it is set as
% \[
@@ -1552,16 +1584,19 @@
% \SpecialEnvIndex{\MoveEqLeft}\cs{MoveEqLeft}\oarg{number}
% \end{codesyntax}
% \ProvidedBy{Lars Madsen}{2008/06/05} In \cite{Swanson}, Ellen
-% Swanson recommends that when ever one has a long displayed formula,
+% Swanson recommends that whenever one has a long displayed formula,
% spanning several lines, and it is unfeasible to align against a
% relation within the first line, then all lines in the display
% should be aligned at the left most edge of the first line, and all
% subsequent lines should be indented by 2\,em (or if needed by a
% smaller amount). That is we are talking about displays that end up
-% looking like this
+% looking like this\footnote{Maintainer (daleif)'s note: This is one
+% of my most used constructions whenever I edit manuscripts. I'd
+% rather use this than for example \env{multline} as I find it gives
+% the text a more consistent look.}
% \begin{align*}
-% \MoveEqLeft \framebox[10cm][c]{Long first line}\\
-% & = \framebox[6cm][c]{ \hphantom{g} 2nd line}\\
+% \MoveEqLeft \Framebox[10cm][c]{Long first line}\\
+% & = \Framebox[6cm][c]{2nd line}\\
% & \leq \dots
% \end{align*}
% Traditionally one could do this by starting subsequent lines by
@@ -1569,8 +1604,8 @@
% was made using \cs{MoveEqLeft}:
% \begin{verbatim}
% \begin{align*}
-% \MoveEqLeft \framebox[10cm][c]{Long first line}\\
-% & = \framebox[6cm][c]{ \hphantom{g} 2nd line}\\
+% \MoveEqLeft \Framebox[10cm][c]{Long first line}\\
+% & = \Framebox[6cm][c]{2nd line}\\
% & \leq \dots
% \end{align*}
% \end{verbatim}
@@ -1581,15 +1616,15 @@
% to accommodate the extra distance to the alignment point:
% \begin{verbatim}
% \begin{align*}
-% \MoveEqLeft[3] \framebox[10cm][c]{Part 1}\\
-% = {} & \framebox[8cm][c]{2nd line}\\
-% & + \framebox[4cm][c]{ last part}
+% \MoveEqLeft[3] \Framebox[10cm][c]{Part 1}\\
+% = {} & \Framebox[8cm][c]{2nd line}\\
+% & + \Framebox[4cm][c]{last part}
% \end{align*}
% \end{verbatim}
% \begin{align*}
-% \MoveEqLeft[3] \framebox[10cm][c]{Long first line}\\
-% = {} & \framebox[6cm][c]{ 2nd line}\\
-% & + \framebox[4cm][c]{ last part}
+% \MoveEqLeft[3] \Framebox[10cm][c]{Long first line}\\
+% = {} & \Framebox[6cm][c]{2nd line}\\
+% & + \Framebox[4cm][c]{last part}
% \end{align*}
%
%
@@ -1596,7 +1631,7 @@
% \noindent\textbf{Caveat regarding \cs{MoveEqLeft}}: If the first
% part of the equation starts with say \verb|[a]|, \cs{MoveEqLeft} may
% attempt to eat it! You can prevent this by specifying the optional
-% argument (remember the default is the same as \cs{MoveEqLeft[2]} or
+% argument (remember the default is the same as \cs{MoveEqLeft[2]}) or
% by using \cs{MoveEqLeft\{\}}.
%
% \subsubsection{Boxing a single line in an alignment}
@@ -1634,8 +1669,8 @@
% & = g(x)
% \end{align*}
% One can have multiple boxes on each line, and the
-% >>\texttt{\textnormal{\&}}\quad right hand side<< can even be
-% missing. Here is an example of how the padding in the box can be changed
+% ``\texttt{\textnormal{\&}}\quad right hand side'' can even be
+% missing. Here is an example of how the padding in the box can be changed.
% \begin{verbatim}
% \begin{align*}
% \setlength\fboxsep{1em}
@@ -1648,7 +1683,7 @@
% \Aboxed{ f(x) &= 0 } & \Aboxed{ g(x) &= b} \\
% \Aboxed{ h(x) } & \Aboxed{ i(x) }
% \end{align*}
-% Note how the \cs{fboxsep} change only affect the box coming
+% Note how the \cs{fboxsep} change only affects the box coming
% immediately after it.
%
% \marginpar{\strut\\%
@@ -1661,6 +1696,33 @@
% use of \texttt{\&}. Just add a set of braces around the construction
% you want to hide.
%
+% \medskip\noindent\textbf{Tip:} At times users want a \cs{Aboxed}
+% with a different type of box. To help we provide a \cs{Aboxed} builder:
+% \begin{codesyntax}
+% \SpecialUsageIndex{\MakeAboxedCommand}\cs{MakeAboxedCommand}\cs{Aboxedname}\cs{boxmacro}
+% \end{codesyntax}
+% where \cs{boxname} should be a macro taking a single argument. The
+% normal \cs{Aboxed} is the same as
+% \verb|\MakeAboxedCommand\Aboxed\fbox|. Thus you can do
+% \newcommand\myboxA[1]{\fcolorbox{gray}{yellow}{#1}}
+% \newcommand\myboxB[1]{{\fboxsep=5pt\fboxrule=2pt\fbox{#1}}}
+% \MakeAboxedCommand\AboxedA\myboxA
+% \MakeAboxedCommand\AboxedB\myboxB
+% \begin{align*}
+% \AboxedA{ f(x) &= x^2 } & \AboxedB{ f(x) &= x^2 }
+% \end{align*}
+% via
+% \begin{verbatim}
+% \newcommand\myboxA[1]{\fcolorbox{gray}{yellow}{#1}}
+% \newcommand\myboxB[1]{{\fboxsep=5pt\fboxrule=2pt\fbox{#1}}}
+% \MakeAboxedCommand\AboxedA\myboxA
+% \MakeAboxedCommand\AboxedB\myboxB
+% \begin{align*}
+% \AboxedA{ f(x) &= x^2 } & \AboxedB{ f(x) &= x^2 }
+% \end{align*}
+% \end{verbatim}
+%
+%
% \subsubsection{Adding arrows between lines in an alignment}
%
% This first macro is a bit misleading, it is only intended to be
@@ -1713,7 +1775,7 @@
%
% \subsubsection{Centered \texorpdfstring{\cs{vdots}}{\textbackslash vdots}}
%
-% If one want to mark a vertical continuation, there is
+% If one wants to mark a vertical continuation, there is
% the \verb?\vdots? command, but combine this with an alignment and
% we get something rather suboptimal
% \FeatureRequest{Bruno Le Floch \\(and many others)}{2011/01/25}
@@ -1735,7 +1797,7 @@
% \SpecialKeyIndex{shortvdotsadjustabove}\makebox{$\key{shortvdotsadjustabove}=\meta{length}$}\\
% \SpecialKeyIndex{shortvdotsadjustbelow}\makebox{$\key{shortvdotsadjustbelow}=\meta{length}$}
% \end{codesyntax}
-% Two examples in one
+% Two examples in one
% \begin{verbatim}
% \begin{align*}
% a &= b \\
@@ -1754,7 +1816,7 @@
% & = d
% \end{align*}
% Thus \verb?\vdotswithin{=}? creates a box corresponding to
-% \verb?{}={}? and typeset a >>$\vdots$<< centered inside it. When
+% \verb?{}={}? and typesets a ``$\vdots$'' centered inside it. When
% doing this as a normal line in an alignment leaves us with excessive
% space which \verb?\shortvdotswithin{=}? takes care with for us.
%
@@ -1842,7 +1904,7 @@
% \cs{shortintertext} and \cs{intertext}. \tsxPosting{Tobias Weh
% \\(referring to a suggestion by Chung-chieh Shan)}{2011/05/29}
% It can be illustrated using the following example, an interested
-% reader, can apply it with and without the original \cs{intertext}
+% reader can apply it with and without the original \cs{intertext}
% and \cs{shortintertext}.
% \begin{verbatim}
% % the original \intertext and \shortintertext
@@ -1859,8 +1921,8 @@
% \myline
% \end{verbatim}
%
-% We now fix this internaly for both \cs{intertext} and
-% \cs{shortintertext}, plus we add the possibility to fine tune
+% We now fix this internally for both \cs{intertext} and
+% \cs{shortintertext}, plus we add the possibility to fine-tune
% spacing around these constructions. The original versions can be
% brought back using the \texttt{original-x} keys below.
% \begin{codesyntax}
@@ -1909,7 +1971,7 @@
% \abs{\frac{a}{b}}
% \]
% Here it won't give a nice result, so you have to manually put in
-% either \cs{left}--\cs{right} pair or a \cs{bigl}--\cs{bigr} pair.
+% either a \cs{left}--\cs{right} pair or a \cs{bigl}--\cs{bigr} pair.
% Both methods mean that you have to delete your \cs{abs} command,
% which may not sound like an ideal solution.
%
@@ -1959,10 +2021,10 @@
% \cs{DeclarePairedDelimiterX} extends the features of
% \cs{DeclarePairedDelimiter} such that the user will get a macro
% which is fenced off at either end, plus the capability to provide
-% the \meta{body} for what ever the macro should do within these
+% the \meta{body} for whatever the macro should do within these
% fences.
%
-% Inside the \meta{body} part, the macro \cs{delimsize} refer to the
+% Inside the \meta{body} part, the macro \cs{delimsize} refers to the
% size of the outer fences. It can then be used inside \meta{body} to
% scale any inner fences.
%
@@ -1990,16 +2052,16 @@
% {#1\,\delimsize\vert\,\mathopen{}#2\,\delimsize\vert\,\mathopen{}#3}
% \end{verbatim}
% \begin{itshape}
-% Note the use of >>\verb|\mathopen{}|<< in the \meta{body} of
+% Note the use of `\verb|\mathopen{}|' in the \meta{body} of
% \cs{braket}, this is very important when a scalable delimiter is
% being used and it does not present itself as a left or right
% delimiter. You will see why it is needed if you use
-% \verb|\braket{A}{-B}| in a version without
+% \verb|\braket{A}{-B}{C}| in a version without
% \verb|\mathopen{}|.\footnote{Basically, the problem is that
% \cs{vert} is a `symbol', thus $\vert-B$ is interpreted
-% \emph{subtraction}, not a symbol followed by negative $B$. When
-% \cs{mathopen\{\}} is added, \TeX\ is told that an opening
-% delimiter just occurred, and it will adjust the minus
+% \emph{subtraction}, not a symbol followed by negative $B$ (aka a
+% sign). When \cs{mathopen\{\}} is added, \TeX\ is told that an
+% opening delimiter just occurred, and it will adjust the minus
% accordingly.}
% \end{itshape}
%
@@ -2041,8 +2103,8 @@
% is a feature of the \cs{left}\dots\cs{right} construction).
% \fi
%
-% With the inner scaling, we can provide macros whos syntax closely
-% follow the mathematical meaning. Fx for building sets, try
+% With the inner scaling, we can provide macros whose syntax closely
+% follows the mathematical meaning. Fx for building sets, try
% this\footnote{The reason for using a separate \cs{SetSymbol} macro
% has to do with complicated set definitions, where the condition
% spans several lines. In this case \cs{Set} cannot be used. Thus it
@@ -2082,7 +2144,7 @@
% \cs{mathchoice\{}\cs{:\}\{}\cs{:\}\{}\cs{,\}\{}\cs{,\}} instead of \cs{nonscript}\cs{:}.}
%
% Combining with \pkg{etoolbox} it becomes easy to make a function
-% that automatically provide a marker for a blank argument:
+% that automatically provides a marker for a blank argument:
% \begin{verbatim}
% \usepackage{etoolbox}
% \DeclarePairedDelimiterX\norm[1]\lVert\rVert{
@@ -2101,7 +2163,7 @@
% \FeatureRequest{Barbara Beeton (on TSE)}{2013/10/07}
% \cs{DeclarePairedDelimiterX} has an annoying caveat: it is very hard
% to make a macro \verb|\lnorm{a}| that should result in $\lVert
-% a\rVert_2$.\footnote{The added >>\texttt{\_2}<< is hard to get around
+% a\rVert_2$.\footnote{The added `\texttt{\_2}' is hard to get around
% the argument parsing.}
%
% As a consequence we provide
@@ -2128,7 +2190,7 @@
% \end{verbatim}
% Thus giving support for \verb|\Prob{A \given B}|.
%
-% \medskip\noindent\textbf{Note 1:} As the number of arguments increase
+% \medskip\noindent\textbf{Note 1:} As the number of arguments increases
% the \cs{DeclarePairedDelimiter...} macros become hard for users to
% understand. A key-value interface would be better. This is planed
% for a future release. In
@@ -2135,7 +2197,7 @@
% \url{http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/136767/3929} there is a
% suggested replacement for \cs{DeclarePairedDelimiter}, that greatly
% reduces the number of macros and provides a key-val
-% interface. However, the code use \pkg{xparse}, and if we want to use
+% interface. However, the code uses \pkg{xparse}, and if we want to use
% \pkg{xparse} for some of our macros, we might just as well rewrite
% the entire \pkg{mathtools} package in \pkg{expl3}. Also it is not
% obvious how to get \pkg{xparse} to support \verb|[3]| for the number
@@ -2143,7 +2205,7 @@
%
% \medskip\noindent\textbf{Note 2:} If you want to define your own
% manual scaler macros, it is important that you besides \cs{foo} also
-% defines \cs{fool} and \cs{foor}. When a scaler is specified, in say
+% define \cs{fool} and \cs{foor}. When a scaler is specified, in say
% \cs{abs[\cs{big}]}\marg{arg}, we actually use \cs{bigl} and
% \cs{bigr}.
%
@@ -2155,7 +2217,7 @@
% auto scaled \cs{left} and \cs{right} fences behave as opening and
% closing fences, i.e.\ $\sin(x)$ vs. $\sin\left(x\right)$ (the later
% made via \verb|$\sin\left(x\right)$|), notice the gap between
-% '$\sin$' and '('. In some special cases it may be useful to be
+% `$\sin$' and `('. In some special cases it may be useful to be
% able to tinker with the behavior.
% \begin{codesyntax}
% \SpecialUsageIndex{\reDeclarePairedDelimiterInnerWrapper}
@@ -2176,7 +2238,7 @@
% \reDeclarePairedDelimiterInnerWrapper\abs{nostarnonscaled}{\mathinner{#1#2#3}}
% \reDeclarePairedDelimiterInnerWrapper\abs{nostarscaled}{\mathinner{#1#2#3}}
% \end{verbatim}
-% The default values for the call backs corresponds to
+% The default values for the call backs correspond to
% \begin{verbatim}
% star: \mathopen{}\mathclose\bgroup #1#2\aftergroup\egroup #3
% nostarnonscaled: \mathopen#1#2\mathclose#3
@@ -2205,7 +2267,7 @@
% construction. Currently, this can only be applied to macros made
% using \cs{DeclarePairedDelimiter} and \emph{not} macros made using
% \cs{DeclarePairedDelimiterX} or \cs{DeclarePairedDelimiterXPP} as
-% the contents is typeset inside a group (to limit \cs{delimsize})
+% the contents are typeset inside a group (to limit \cs{delimsize})
% and thus hide any \verb|&| or \verb|\\| from \env{align} and
% \env{align} breaks down.
%
@@ -2300,7 +2362,7 @@
% the equal sign, leading to an odd-looking output. The command
% \cs{vcentcolon} is a shorthand for such a vertically centered
% colon, and can be used as in |$a \vcentcolon= b$| and results in
-% the desired output: $a \vcentcolon= b$. % for now
+% the desired output: $a \vcentcolon= b$.
% See also the \pkg{colonequals} package.
%
% Typing \cs{vcentcolon} every time is quite tedious, so one can use
@@ -2341,11 +2403,11 @@
% \SpecialUsageIndex{\Colonsim}\cs{Colonsim}\\
% \SpecialUsageIndex{\dblcolon}\cs{dblcolon}
% \end{codesyntax}
-% The font packages \pkg{txfonts} and \pkg{pxfonts} provides various
+% The font packages \pkg{txfonts} and \pkg{pxfonts} provide various
% symbols that include a vertically centered colon but with tighter
% spacing. For example, the combination |:=| exists as the symbol
% \cs{coloneqq} which typesets as $\coloneqq$ instead of
-% $\vcentcolon=$. The primary disadvantage of using these fonts are
+% $\vcentcolon=$. The primary disadvantage of using these fonts is
% the support packages' lack of support for \pkg{amsmath} (and thus
% \pkg{mathtools}) and worse yet, the side-bearings are way too
% tight; see~\cite{A-W:MG04} for examples. If you're not using these
@@ -2375,11 +2437,11 @@
% \end{codesyntax}
%
% \noindent
-% \textbf{Note:} that these symbols are constructed via
+% \textbf{Note:} These symbols are constructed via
% features from the \pkg{graphicx} package, and thus may not display
% correctly in most DVI previewers. Also note that \cs{nuparrow} and
% \cs{ndownarrow} are constructed via \cs{nrightarrow} and
-% \cs{nleftarrrow} respectively, so these needs to be
+% \cs{nleftarrrow} respectively, so these need to be
% present. Usually this is done via \pkg{amssymb}, but some packages
% may be incompatible with \pkg{amssymb} so the user will have to
% load \pkg{amssymb} or a similar package, that provides
@@ -2442,15 +2504,15 @@
% \par
% \end{quote}
% \noindent
-% As of 2013, \cs(\cs) are robust, as is the italic corrected versions.
+% As of 2013, \cs(\cs) are robust, as are the italic corrected versions.
%
% \medskip\noindent \textbf{Caveat:} Italic correction is a
% treacherous area. For example any penalties will cancel the italic
% correction inserted by
% \verb|\(| (for an explanation see \cite{TBT}, section 4.3.3). We
-% have changed Michaels original to accommodate one specific penalty
+% have changed Michael's original to accommodate one specific penalty
% construction: the \emph{tie}, i.e.,
-% >>\verb|text~\(|<< will work as expected (as~of July, 2014).
+% `\verb|text~\(|' will work as expected (as~of July, 2014).
%
% \subsection{Left sub/superscripts}
%
@@ -2692,7 +2754,7 @@
% \medskip\noindent \textbf{Note:} If you try to nest \cs{splitfrac}
% inside each other you may need to add \cs{mathstrut} to the first
% argument of the nested fraction to get the spacing look even. It is
-% not added by default as often a more cramped looked is desired:
+% not added by default as often a more cramped look is desired:
% \begin{verbatim}
% \[
% \frac{
@@ -2748,9 +2810,9 @@
% \FeatureRequest{Frank Mittelbach}{2020} In typography we use
% \emph{struts} to ensure specific line spacing. In text we have the
% \cs{strut} and in math \cs{mathstrut}. Both have no width, but
-% equals the height and depth of an »(« from the current text/math
+% equal the height and depth of an »(« from the current text/math
% font and size. In math we often need to make minute adjustments in
-% macro definitiones etc. The \emph{extended} math strut
+% macro definitions etc. The \emph{extended} math strut
% \cs{xmathstrut} allows to \emph{increase} (decrease if negative)
% the math strut in two ways.
%
@@ -2759,7 +2821,7 @@
% \verb|\xmathstrut{0.1}|
% \end{center}
% will give you a new strut where 10\% of the \emph{total height of
-% the normal math stut} (\verb|\mathstrut=\xmathstrut{0}|) will be
+% the normal math strut} (\verb|\mathstrut=\xmathstrut{0}|) will be
% added to both \emph{the height} and \emph{the depth} of the
% original strut (thus 20\% gets added in total). On the other hand
% \begin{center}
@@ -2809,6 +2871,7 @@
% \llap{\rlap{\rule{18mm}{0.1pt}}\quad}a \vfb{\mathstrut} \ \vfb{\xmathstrut{0}}\
% \vfb{\xmathstrut{0.5} } \ \vfb{\xmathstrut{-0.1} }\ \vfb{\xmathstrut[0.5]{0}} a
% \]
+% \newpage
% \begin{verbatim}
% \newcommand\vfb[1]{\begingroup\fboxsep=0pt\boxed{\,#1\,}\endgroup}
% \[
@@ -2983,7 +3046,7 @@
% \begin{macrocode}
%<*package>
\ProvidesPackage{mathtools}%
- [2021/04/12 v1.27 mathematical typesetting tools]
+ [2021/02/02 v1.28 mathematical typesetting tools]
% \end{macrocode}
% \changes{v1.10}{2011/02/12}{Might as well make sure that we need the
% latest version of \texttt{mhsetup}}
@@ -2996,6 +3059,9 @@
% We'd like to make \cs{(}\cs{)} and \cs{[}\cs{]} robust. This can
% easily be done via the \pkg{fixltx2e} package, but auto loading that
% package may cause problems for some. We make copies instead.
+% Update 2021: We have removed robustifying \cs{(}\cs{)}\cs{[}\cs{]}
+% as this is now in the \LaTeX\ kernel. We still use
+% \verb|\EQ_MakeRobust| elsewhere though.
% \begin{macro}{\EQ_MakeRobust}
% \begin{macro}{\forced_EQ_MakeRobust}
% \begin{macrocode}
@@ -3002,8 +3068,8 @@
% borrowed from fixltx2e
\def\EQ_MakeRobust#1{%
\@ifundefined{\expandafter\@gobble\string#1}{%
- \@latex at error{The control sequence `\string#1' is undefined!%
- \MessageBreak There is nothing here to make robust}%
+ \@latex at error{The~control~sequence~`\string#1'~is~undefined!%
+ \MessageBreak There~is~nothing~here~to~make~robust}%
\@eha
}%
{%
@@ -3021,7 +3087,7 @@
\noexpand\protect\expandafter\noexpand
\csname\expandafter\@gobble\string#1\space\endcsname}%
}%
- {\@latex at info{The control sequence `\string#1' is already robust}}%
+ {\@latex at info{The~control~sequence~`\string#1'~is~already~robust}}%
}%
}
% \end{macrocode}
@@ -3030,8 +3096,8 @@
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\forced_EQ_MakeRobust#1{%
\@ifundefined{\expandafter\@gobble\string#1}{%
- \@latex at error{The control sequence `\string#1' is undefined!%
- \MessageBreak There is nothing here to make robust}%
+ \@latex at error{The~control~sequence~`\string#1'~is~undefined!%
+ \MessageBreak There~is~nothing~here~to~make~robust}%
\@eha
}%
{%
@@ -3129,18 +3195,20 @@
}
% \end{macrocode}
% \end{macro}
-% \changes{v1.13}{2013/02/11}{Make \cs{(}\cs{)} and \cs{[}\cs{]}
-% robust}
-% We start of with making \cs{(}\cs{)} and \cs{[}\cs{]} robust,
-% unless the user explicitly asked us not to.
-% \begin{macrocode}
-\MH_if_boolean:nT {robustify}{
- \EQ_MakeRobust\(
- \EQ_MakeRobust\)
- \EQ_MakeRobust\[
- \EQ_MakeRobust\]
-}
-% \end{macrocode}
+% ^^A \changes{v1.13}{2013/02/11}{Make \cs{(}\cs{)} and \cs{[}\cs{]}
+% ^^A robust}
+% ^^A We start of with making \cs{(}\cs{)} and \cs{[}\cs{]} robust,
+% ^^A unless the user explicitly asked us not to.
+% ^^A \changes{v1.28}{2021/12/31}{Removed robustifying \cs{(}\cs{)} and
+% ^^A \cs{[}\cs{]} as this is now in the \LaTeX{} kernel.}
+% ^^A % \begin{macrocode}
+% ^^A \MH_if_boolean:nT {robustify}{
+% ^^A \EQ_MakeRobust\(
+% ^^A \EQ_MakeRobust\)
+% ^^A \EQ_MakeRobust\[
+% ^^A \EQ_MakeRobust\]
+% ^^A }
+% ^^A % \end{macrocode}
%
%
% \section{Macros I got ideas for myself}
@@ -3541,6 +3609,8 @@
% \changes{v1.24}{2020/03/13}{Added spaces to move the argument away
% from the arrow head in \cs{xLeftarrow}, \cs{xRightarrow} and
% \cs{xLeftrightarrow}. Suggested by FM}
+% \changes{1.28}{2022/01/01}{Added \cs{xlongrightarrow} and
+% \cs{xlongleftarrow} as suggested in Issue \#12}
% \begin{macrocode}
\providecommand*\xleftrightarrow[2][]{%
\ext at arrow 3095\MT_leftrightarrow_fill:{#1}{#2}}
@@ -3578,6 +3648,13 @@
\arrowfill@\leftharpoondown\relbar\relbar}
\def\MT_leftharpoonup_fill:{%
\arrowfill@\leftharpoonup\relbar\relbar}
+% \end{macrocode}
+% 2022: added \verb+_fill:+ macros based upon \cs{longrightarrow} and \cs{longleftarrow}
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\def\MT_longrightarrow_fill:{%
+ \arrowfill@\relbar\relbar\longrightarrow}
+\def\MT_longleftarrow_fill:{%
+ \arrowfill@\longleftarrow\relbar\relbar}
\providecommand*\xrightharpoondown[2][]{%
\ext at arrow 0359\MT_rightharpoondown_fill:{#1}{#2}}
\providecommand*\xrightharpoonup[2][]{%
@@ -3599,6 +3676,14 @@
$\ext at arrow 3095\MT_leftharpoondown_fill:{#1}{\phantom{#2}}$}%
\kern-\wd0 \lower.22ex\box0}}
% \end{macrocode}
+% 2022: added \verb+\xlong...+ macros based upon \cs{longrightarrow}
+% and \cs{longleftarrow}
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\providecommand*\xlongrightarrow[2][]{%
+ \ext at arrow 0359\MT_longrightarrow_fill:{#1}{#2}}
+\providecommand*\xlongleftarrow[2][]{%
+ \ext at arrow 3095\MT_longleftarrow_fill:{#1}{#2}}
+% \end{macrocode}
% \end{macro}
% \end{macro}
% \end{macro}
@@ -5349,12 +5434,55 @@
\def\@Aboxed#1\ENDDNE{%
\ifnum0=`{}\fi \setbox \z@
\hbox{$\displaystyle#1{}\m at th$\kern\fboxsep \kern\fboxrule }%
- \edef\@tempa {\kern \wd\z@ &\kern -\the\wd\z@ \fboxsep
- \the\fboxsep \fboxrule \the\fboxrule }\@tempa \boxed {#1#2}%
+ \edef\@tempa {\kern \wd\z@ &\kern -\the\wd\z@
+% \end{macrocode}
+% The \verb|\fboxsep\the\fboxsep...| line ensures that you can use
+% \verb|\fboxsep=10pt\Aboxed{...}| in a pinch.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+ \fboxsep\the\fboxsep \fboxrule \the\fboxrule }\@tempa \boxed {#1#2}%
}
% \end{macrocode}
% \end{macro}
%
+% \begin{macro}{\MakeAboxedCommand}
+% \changes{1.28}{2022/01/01}{Added}
+% At times users want macros equivalent to \cs{Aboxed} but with a
+% different box as the base. So we provide one
+% \begin{macrocode}
+\newcommand\MakeAboxedCommand[2]{
+ % #1: command to create
+ % #2: box command to use
+ \newcommand#1[1]{\let\bgroup{\romannumeral-`}%
+ \@nameuse{@@\MH_cs_to_str:N #1}##1&&\ENDDNE}
+ \@namedef{@@\MH_cs_to_str:N #1}##1&##2&##3\ENDDNE{%
+% \end{macrocode}
+% Instead of hardcoding the kerning of box rule and box sep, we record
+% the width of an empty box and kern half of it.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+ \settowidth\@tempdimc{#2{}}%
+ \ifnum0=`{}\fi \setbox \z@
+ \hbox{$\displaystyle##1{}\m at th$\kern0.5\@tempdimc}%
+% \end{macrocode}
+% The \verb|\fboxsep\the\fboxsep...| line enables
+% \verb|\fboxsep=10\Command{...&...}|. Of course only works for boxed
+% that uses \cs{fboxsep} and \cs{fboxrule}.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+ \edef\@tempa{\kern\wd\z@&\kern-\the\wd\z@%
+ \fboxsep\the\fboxsep \fboxrule \the\fboxrule}%
+ \@tempa%
+% \end{macrocode}
+% Instead of using \cs{boxed} directly, we mimick the definition of
+% \cs{boxed} and should thus be able to use any box.
+% \begin{macrocode}
+ #2{\m at th$\displaystyle ##1##2$}%
+ }
+}
+
+% \end{macrocode}
+%
+% \end{macro}
+%
+%
% \begin{macro}{\ArrowBetweenLines}
% \changes{v1.05}{2008/06/05}{Added \cs{ArrowBetweenLines} as it
% belongs here and not just in my \LaTeX book (daleif)}
Modified: trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/mathtools/mathtools.ins
===================================================================
--- trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/mathtools/mathtools.ins 2022-02-02 21:40:02 UTC (rev 61855)
+++ trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/mathtools/mathtools.ins 2022-02-02 21:40:29 UTC (rev 61856)
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
%% Copyright (C) 2012-2019 by Lars Madsen
%% Copyright (C) 2020- by Lars Madsen, the LaTeX3 project
%%
+%%
%% This work may be distributed and/or modified under the
%% conditions of the LaTeX Project Public License, either
%% version 1.3c of this license or (at your option) any later
Modified: trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/mathtools/mhsetup.dtx
===================================================================
--- trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/mathtools/mhsetup.dtx 2022-02-02 21:40:02 UTC (rev 61855)
+++ trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/mathtools/mhsetup.dtx 2022-02-02 21:40:29 UTC (rev 61856)
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@
% \cs{InternalSyntaxOn} which makes |_| and |:| letters and then
% automatically restores the category codes at the end of the
% package. This usually works fine but when you try to load
-% \pkg{amstext} you will experience that \TeX{} goes into an
+% \pkg{\mbox{amstext}} you will experience that \TeX{} goes into an
% infinite loop. Packages containing code like
% |\@for\@tempa:=\@tempb\do{...}| will not work correctly either,
% thus we provide an alternative version here with the pair of
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@
% The standard behavior of scanning for optional arguments in
% \LaTeX{} allows any number of spaces preceding the optional
% argument and that is not always good in math. For that reason
-% \pkg{amsmath} makes sure that commands like |\\| disallows spaces
+% \pkg{amsmath} makes sure that commands like |\\| disallow spaces
% before the optional argument but at the same time it fails to
% provide ``safe'' environments. What would you expect from the
% following input?
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@
% The whole idea is to provide programming tools that are convenient
% but not yet widely available. I hope this'll be obsolete soon!
%
-% Firstly we setup a few helper functions.
+% Firstly we set up a few helper functions.
% \begin{macro}{\MH_let:NwN}
% An alias for \cs{let}.
% \begin{macrocode}
@@ -354,8 +354,8 @@
% \end{macrocode}
% \end{macro}
% \begin{macro}{\MH_let:cc}
-% This one has takes a \cs{csname}-\cs{endcsname} name and \cs{let}s
-% it to a another \cs{csname}-\cs{endcsname} name. To be used in
+% This one takes a \cs{csname}-\cs{endcsname} name and \cs{let}s
+% it to another \cs{csname}-\cs{endcsname} name. To be used in
% constructions with weird characters like \texttt{*} or alike in
% them and can take a \cs{global} prefix if wanted (we want that
% later on).
Added: trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/mathtools/mhsetup.ins
===================================================================
--- trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/mathtools/mhsetup.ins (rev 0)
+++ trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/mathtools/mhsetup.ins 2022-02-02 21:40:29 UTC (rev 61856)
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+%%
+%% This is file `mhsetup.ins',
+%% generated with the docstrip utility.
+%%
+%% The original source files were:
+%%
+%% mhsetup.dtx (with options: `install')
+%%
+%% This is a generated file.
+%%
+%% Copyright (C) 2002-2007,2010 by Morten Hoegholm
+%% Copyright (C) 2017-2019 by Lars Madsen
+%% Copyright (C) 2020- by Lars Madsen, The LaTeX3 team
+%%
+%% This work may be distributed and/or modified under the
+%% conditions of the LaTeX Project Public License, either
+%% version 1.3 of this license or (at your option) any later
+%% version. The latest version of this license is in
+%% http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt
+%% and version 1.3 or later is part of all distributions of
+%% LaTeX version 2005/12/01 or later.
+%%
+%% This work has the LPPL maintenance status "maintained".
+%%
+%% This Current Maintainer of this work is Lars Madsen
+%% <daleif at math.au.dk>, The LaTeX3 team https://github.com/latex3/mathtools
+%%
+%% This work consists of the main source file mhsetup.dtx
+%% and the derived files
+%% mhsetup.sty, mhsetup.pdf, mhsetup.ins, mhsetup.drv.
+%%
+\input docstrip.tex
+\Msg{************************************************************************}
+\Msg{* Installation}
+\Msg{* Package: mhsetup 2017/03/31 v1.3 mhsetup}
+\Msg{************************************************************************}
+
+\keepsilent
+\askforoverwritefalse
+
+\preamble
+
+This is a generated file.
+
+Copyright (C) 2002-2007,2010 by Morten Hoegholm
+Copyright (C) 2017-2019 by Lars Madsen
+Copyright (C) 2020- by Lars Madsen, The LaTeX3 team
+
+This work may be distributed and/or modified under the
+conditions of the LaTeX Project Public License, either
+version 1.3 of this license or (at your option) any later
+version. The latest version of this license is in
+ http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt
+and version 1.3 or later is part of all distributions of
+LaTeX version 2005/12/01 or later.
+
+This work has the LPPL maintenance status "maintained".
+
+This Current Maintainer of this work is Lars Madsen
+<daleif at math.au.dk>, The LaTeX3 team https://github.com/latex3/mathtools
+
+This work consists of the main source file mhsetup.dtx
+and the derived files
+ mhsetup.sty, mhsetup.pdf, mhsetup.ins, mhsetup.drv.
+
+\endpreamble
+
+\generate{%
+ \file{mhsetup.ins}{\from{mhsetup.dtx}{install}}%
+ \file{mhsetup.drv}{\from{mhsetup.dtx}{driver}}%
+ \usedir{tex/latex/mh}%
+ \file{mhsetup.sty}{\from{mhsetup.dtx}{package}}%
+}
+
+\obeyspaces
+\Msg{************************************************************************}
+\Msg{*}
+\Msg{* To finish the installation you have to move the following}
+\Msg{* file into a directory searched by TeX:}
+\Msg{*}
+\Msg{* mhsetup.sty}
+\Msg{*}
+\Msg{* To produce the documentation run the file `mhsetup.drv'}
+\Msg{* through LaTeX.}
+\Msg{*}
+\Msg{* Happy TeXing!}
+\Msg{*}
+\Msg{************************************************************************}
+
+\endbatchfile
+\endinput
+%%
+%% End of file `mhsetup.ins'.
Modified: trunk/Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/mathtools/mathtools.sty
===================================================================
--- trunk/Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/mathtools/mathtools.sty 2022-02-02 21:40:02 UTC (rev 61855)
+++ trunk/Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/mathtools/mathtools.sty 2022-02-02 21:40:29 UTC (rev 61856)
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
%% mathtools.sty, mathtools.pdf, mathtools.ins, mathtools.drv.
%%
\ProvidesPackage{mathtools}%
- [2021/04/12 v1.27 mathematical typesetting tools]
+ [2021/02/02 v1.28 mathematical typesetting tools]
\RequirePackage{keyval,calc}
\RequirePackage{mhsetup}[2021/03/18]
\MHInternalSyntaxOn
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@
% borrowed from fixltx2e
\def\EQ_MakeRobust#1{%
\@ifundefined{\expandafter\@gobble\string#1}{%
- \@latex at error{The control sequence `\string#1' is undefined!%
- \MessageBreak There is nothing here to make robust}%
+ \@latex at error{The~control~sequence~`\string#1'~is~undefined!%
+ \MessageBreak There~is~nothing~here~to~make~robust}%
\@eha
}%
{%
@@ -57,13 +57,13 @@
\noexpand\protect\expandafter\noexpand
\csname\expandafter\@gobble\string#1\space\endcsname}%
}%
- {\@latex at info{The control sequence `\string#1' is already robust}}%
+ {\@latex at info{The~control~sequence~`\string#1'~is~already~robust}}%
}%
}
\def\forced_EQ_MakeRobust#1{%
\@ifundefined{\expandafter\@gobble\string#1}{%
- \@latex at error{The control sequence `\string#1' is undefined!%
- \MessageBreak There is nothing here to make robust}%
+ \@latex at error{The~control~sequence~`\string#1'~is~undefined!%
+ \MessageBreak There~is~nothing~here~to~make~robust}%
\@eha
}%
{%
@@ -122,12 +122,6 @@
{You~ have~ to~ select~ either~ `true'~ or~ `false'}
{I'll~ assume~ you~ chose~ `false'~ for~ now.}
}
-\MH_if_boolean:nT {robustify}{
- \EQ_MakeRobust\(
- \EQ_MakeRobust\)
- \EQ_MakeRobust\[
- \EQ_MakeRobust\]
-}
\def\MT_define_tagform:nwnn #1[#2]#3#4{
\@namedef{MT_tagform_#1:n}##1
{\maketag@@@{#3\ignorespaces#2{##1}\unskip\@@italiccorr#4}}
@@ -334,6 +328,10 @@
\arrowfill@\leftharpoondown\relbar\relbar}
\def\MT_leftharpoonup_fill:{%
\arrowfill@\leftharpoonup\relbar\relbar}
+\def\MT_longrightarrow_fill:{%
+ \arrowfill@\relbar\relbar\longrightarrow}
+\def\MT_longleftarrow_fill:{%
+ \arrowfill@\longleftarrow\relbar\relbar}
\providecommand*\xrightharpoondown[2][]{%
\ext at arrow 0359\MT_rightharpoondown_fill:{#1}{#2}}
\providecommand*\xrightharpoonup[2][]{%
@@ -354,6 +352,10 @@
\setbox0=\hbox{%
$\ext at arrow 3095\MT_leftharpoondown_fill:{#1}{\phantom{#2}}$}%
\kern-\wd0 \lower.22ex\box0}}
+\providecommand*\xlongrightarrow[2][]{%
+ \ext at arrow 0359\MT_longrightarrow_fill:{#1}{#2}}
+\providecommand*\xlongleftarrow[2][]{%
+ \ext at arrow 3095\MT_longleftarrow_fill:{#1}{#2}}
\providecommand*\xhookleftarrow[2][]{%
\ext at arrow 3095\MT_hookleft_fill:{#1}{#2}}
\def\MT_hookleft_fill:{%
@@ -1201,9 +1203,25 @@
\def\@Aboxed#1\ENDDNE{%
\ifnum0=`{}\fi \setbox \z@
\hbox{$\displaystyle#1{}\m at th$\kern\fboxsep \kern\fboxrule }%
- \edef\@tempa {\kern \wd\z@ &\kern -\the\wd\z@ \fboxsep
- \the\fboxsep \fboxrule \the\fboxrule }\@tempa \boxed {#1#2}%
+ \edef\@tempa {\kern \wd\z@ &\kern -\the\wd\z@
+ \fboxsep\the\fboxsep \fboxrule \the\fboxrule }\@tempa \boxed {#1#2}%
}
+\newcommand\MakeAboxedCommand[2]{
+ % #1: command to create
+ % #2: box command to use
+ \newcommand#1[1]{\let\bgroup{\romannumeral-`}%
+ \@nameuse{@@\MH_cs_to_str:N #1}##1&&\ENDDNE}
+ \@namedef{@@\MH_cs_to_str:N #1}##1&##2&##3\ENDDNE{%
+ \settowidth\@tempdimc{#2{}}%
+ \ifnum0=`{}\fi \setbox \z@
+ \hbox{$\displaystyle##1{}\m at th$\kern0.5\@tempdimc}%
+ \edef\@tempa{\kern\wd\z@&\kern-\the\wd\z@%
+ \fboxsep\the\fboxsep \fboxrule \the\fboxrule}%
+ \@tempa%
+ #2{\m at th$\displaystyle ##1##2$}%
+ }
+}
+
\MHInternalSyntaxOff
\def\ArrowBetweenLines{\relax
\iffalse{\fi\ifnum0=`}\fi
More information about the tex-live-commits
mailing list.