[tex-k] do not understand
Karl Berry
karl at freefriends.org
Sat Dec 19 00:16:15 CET 2020
Hi again Wolfgang,
Did I miss something? Is this one of the little white lies? Or is this
an error in the TeXbook?
I would not call it either a lie or an error. It seems to me that the
explanation is in the sentence in the paragraph after the exercise:
a sequence ... will vanish as a unit ...
unless the optimum breakpoint sequence includes one or more of the
penalties.
The "optimum breakpoint sequence" is being forced to include both (all)
-10000 penalties, therefore they are not discarded.
Another hint is in the answer to the exercise:
... unless both of those values force breaks.
So there are clues that -10000 penalties are special wrt discarding.
I can imagine other ways to word this that might be clearer, but I can't
justify adding another report to the pile for this. --best, karl.
More information about the tex-k
mailing list.