[tex-k] Patch: engine --version gives uncommon version sequence
olaf at infovore.xs4all.nl
Thu Sep 16 07:58:24 CEST 2004
Karl Berry writes:
> What I don't know is why
> the current method was chosen (I inherited this aspect of the code).
> Geez. I see my first ChangeLog entry for printversion is back in 1996.
> 8 years ago, there was no real attempt at integrating all these
> different engines. In fact the term "engine" itself had not come into
> Regularizing the --version output sounds like a good idea to me.
I'll put it in then.
(This space left blank for technical reasons.)
More information about the tex-k