[tex-k] Re: Bug#249466: dvips: explain paper handling better(patch)

[Akira Kakuto]

>     Except that dvips.pdf has some garbage in the section about literal
>     PostScript examples.
> 
> It's true that the literal PS examples do not work in PDF, so the
> examples come out as either blank or black, but that seems unavoidable
> to me.  PDF does not support arbitrary PS.

The literal PS examples do not work by the next:
texi2dvi --pdf dvips.texi

However, I think the following may work (needs Ghostscript):

texi2dvi dvips.texi
dvips -Ppdf -z -o dvips.ps dvips
ps2pdf14 dvips.ps dvips.pdf

Best regards
Akira