[tex-hyphen] Bulgarian hyphenation patterns

[Mojca Miklavec]

Hello Georgi,

Thanks a lot for your answer.

On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Georgi Boshnakov
<georgi.boshnakov at manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> Quoting Mojca Miklavec <mojca.miklavec.lists at gmail.com>:
>
>> Oh, and I forgot to mention - if the patterns are indeed working
>> properly, the next set of questions would be:
>>
>> 1.) May we remove texmf-dist/tex/generic/bghyphen/ from TeX Live? (you
>> may still leave it on CTAN; TeX Live would not use it anyway unless
>> users start messing with their configurations)
>
> Sure.

Norbert - here you have the answer :)
I will remove dependency in the scripts.

>> Also, if we get your blessing, it would be nice to update your
>> documentation to mention the changes (which will hopefully become
>> upstream in both MikTeX and TeX Live), maybe to change the copyright
>> note on top of our files, or even put your documentation into our
>> repository (if you want that).
>>
>
> Could you give me a pointer as to how to get permission to upload files in
> the repository?

Karl gives away accounts, he's in CC.

>> 2.) May we ask you to update texmf-dist/doc/generic/bghyphen/ to
>> mention the changes and strategy of loading, compile the document with
>> outline fonts (instead of bitmap ones) and send it to us, so that we
>> would include it into our package then (that would be the easiest
>> way)?
>
> ok

(Some people aren't really active or have never used SVN themselves,
so they have asked us to upload the files for them, but if you can do
it yourself, that's much better - you can commit changes at any time.)

> It is amusing that two days ago I uploaded the patterns on CTAN (the only
> change was the encoding to ^^xx etc.).

This page:
    http://tug.ctan.org/tex-archive/language/hyphenation/bghyphen/
still lists the old files.

If updating patterns from CTAN was automatic and no changes (new
package) were made, the patterns would be broken in XeTeX now :) One
reason more why we want Unicode patterns ...

Mojca