[pracjourn-forum] Re: Pitfalls (was: Some initial thoughts
Karl Berry
karl at freefriends.org
Tue Apr 26 14:57:09 CEST 2005
Could the list at http://www.ucc.ie:8080/cocoon/cc/elec-pub/latex/howto
(which I cobbled together from Christina's excellent
set of comments) form a basis for this?
It seems like a very nice start. Naturally I can't resist comments:
- What's wrong with \pounds? (Maybe links to fuller
explanations are desirable in some cases.)
- Not sure helico-pter is the best example of hyphenation. That is an
extremely weird/wrong hyphenation in US English. How about an example
that is the same in US and UK, e.g., data-base? Ghost-script? (And
this points that giving the command to set hyphenation would be
valuable.)
- Instead of mentioning \verb solely for _, I suggest just mentioning
\verb and \begin{verbatim} (and alltt?) separately. People do need
every character in verbatim mode, but it's rather a different case
than getting the chars in roman.
- Instead of "Reserved Characters" for the first heading, I suggest
"Special Characters", and add one more entry: "for 8-bit
(pre-accented) characters, use \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc} (or
latin2 or ...)" ...or whatever we're supposed to do these days.
- The image of the top of a browser window (or whatever it is) seems a
bit odd as an example of leaders.
As this is a discrete task, not actually bound to the
PracJourn work, I suggest we take it to a forum of its
own (eg pitfalls at tug.org or something...Karl?)
If there's a lot of people here who don't want to be in on this, it
would make sense. But I suspect the 12 or so of us on this list are all
interested.
I suggest the first step would be to ensure the list of
reserved characters is bulletproof, so that anyone following
I don't see any others on my keyboard for plain and LaTeX.
Does ConTeXt reserve other characters?
k
More information about the pracjourn-forum
mailing list