[OS X TeX] A heretic thought

[George Gratzer]

I redid the macros, typeset the book. It looks so neat!

GG

On Aug 4, 2014, at 7:03 PM, Nestor E. Aguilera <nestoreaguilera at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> On 4 Aug 2014, at 18:29, Axel E. Retif wrote:
> 
>> On 08/04/2014 03:43 PM, George Gratzer wrote:
>> 
>>> I started working on the 5th edition of /More Math into LaTeX/.
>>> 
>>> And I have a thought. What would happen if  write
>>> 
>>> Tex
>>> 
>>> and
>>> 
>>> LaTex
>>> 
>>> no fancy staff. Would it not look nicer?
>> 
>> No. I would not buy it just for that. For me, it would be a disrespect for the work of Knuth, Lamport, and the LaTeX3 team.
>> 
>> That's the only thing I dislike about Texmaker (which I write TeXmaker anyway) ---I recommend it a lot, but don't use it myself (I only use Emacs on GNU/Linux and TeXShop on Mac OS X).
>> 
>> 
>> Best
>> 
>> Axel
> 
> My one cent: a middle ground solution may be to write the "logo" (\TeX, \LaTeX, etc.) in very few places (perhaps at the beginning), and otherwise use "latex" (or "LaTeX", but this already may become tiresome).
> 
> I like Michael's suggestion of using a macro such as \latex, as you may postpone your decision.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Nestor
> 
> 
> 
> ----------- Please Consult the Following Before Posting -----------
> TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
> List Reminders and Etiquette: http://email.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
> List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
> TeX on Mac OS X Website: http://mactex-wiki.tug.org/
> List Info: https://email.esm.psu.edu/mailman/listinfo/macosx-tex

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/attachments/20140805/ce23b732/attachment.html>