[OS X TeX] citep and citet did not work in MacOSX-TeXShop
herbs at wideopenwest.com
Thu Feb 26 16:44:25 CET 2009
On Feb 26, 2009, at 9:22 AM, Herbert Schulz wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2009, at 8:01 AM, Herbert Schulz wrote:
>> On Feb 25, 2009, at 9:14 PM, Danny Baillie wrote:
>>> On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:24:47 -0600, Herbert Schulz <herbs at wideopenwest.com
>>> > wrote:
>>> "[...] place the line %%!TEX TS-program = pdflatexmk at the top of
>>> your tex source file and Typeset (Cmd-T) will do all of the
>>> necessary processing for you."
>>> Following the above message from Herb, I've been trying to use
>>> latexmk (rather than pdflatexmk because I want to use psfrags with
>>> laprint). I keep getting the messages:
>>> Latexmk: File './basename.pfg' changed during run. I must rerun
>>> Latexmk: Absolute maximum runs of latex reached without finding
>>> stable source files
>>> The .pfg file seems to be zero size throughout. It is made by
>>> psfrags, as can be seen from messages such as:
>>> (./effmass.tex <psfrag:effmass.eps> (./basename.pfg) <effmass.eps>)
>>> The extension pfg isn't one of the generated_exts (from looking in
>>> the perl script latexmk), and it isn't pushed in latexmkrc, so I
>>> thought it wouldn't matter if it changed anyway. How do I get
>>> latexmk to ignore the pfg files?
>>> This may be related to the problem with .ent files in mentioned in http://www.tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/2007-February/028839.html
>>> Thanks for any help,
>> What are the processing steps you use to go from pfg->eps? I'll
>> then be able to tell you the lines to add to the latexmkrc.
>> Could you send me a small tex source file and processing
>> instructions (if done manually) so I can test?
>> Good Luck,
>> Herb Schulz
>> (herbs at wideopenwest dot com)
> I misunderstood what psfrag was doing. I'm not sure, right now, how
> to handle this ``run on'' condition but am in contact with the
> latexmk maintainer about it. I'll get back to you as soon as I have
> a handle on it.
> Hmmm... I just took the psfrag document source (had to fix a couple
> of things up to have it compile --- some commands were already
> defined and some needed protection for use in section headings) but
> it all compiled fine using the latexmk engine. Are you sure its
> the .pfg file that is causing the problem?
> Good Luck,
> Herb Schulz
> (herbs at wideopenwest dot com)
Sigh... one more thing... What version of TeXShop and latexmk are you
(herbs at wideopenwest dot com)
More information about the macostex-archives