[OS X TeX] OT: Pages format definitions

suzume at mx82.tiki.ne.jp suzume at mx82.tiki.ne.jp
Sat Sep 17 08:47:13 CEST 2005

On 2005/09/17, at 15:22, Bruno Voisin wrote:

> There are times when the only difference between MS and Apple seems  
> to be a matter of market share, and when I consider switching to  
> one brand of Linux...

I totally understand what you mean. But don't you think there are  
chances iWorks is more likely to support OpenDocument files ? Pages  
already does WordML, XML, html etc, next step is likely to be the MS  
"open" format (XML+zip) and if they go that far the OD format  
(another XML+zip) is just a step away... Meanwhile, MS keeps  
repeating that there are no ways they'll support OD.

Different [OT] subject, NeoOffice is going to shift to the OOo 1.1.5  
code base in a few weeks. 1.1.5 is 1.1.4+OD support (1.1.4 only  
supports SX* files).

JC Helary
------------------------- Info --------------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
          & FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/

More information about the macostex-archives mailing list