[OS X TeX] Code folding

Alain Schremmer Schremmer.Alain at verizon.net
Thu Aug 4 19:31:43 CEST 2005


Mark Smith wrote:

>@ 16:27 on 4.8.05, Alain Schremmer wrote:
>
>  
>
>>>additional "structural view" of the document might be as good as, or
>>>preferable to folding ? 
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>
>>Here, I don't "see" what you have in mind.
>>    
>>
>
>You snipped me there a bit. I was just thinking out loud: *If* one had:
>
>        markers (a la functions) which are navigable (including via
>keystrokes)
>
>  
>
Sorry about that but, because of the "and", I hadn't realized the one 
was conditional on the other.

>and:
>
>        some kind of extra view of the document (maybe a drawer, maybe
>an extra window, maybe something else ?)
>
>...would folding still be desirable/necessary ?
>
>To provide some context, there are a couple of OS X apps, that I am
>aware of, that provide all three (i.e. folding, structure navigation
>
I am leading a protected life and have no idea what "structure 
navigation" could be.

>and
>a separate structural view): Omnioutliner and oXygen. Some that provide
>two (e.g. TextMate (markers and folding)) and others with (at the
>moment) only one (e.g. BBEdit (only has markers)). I reckon that having
>all three is not really necessary. 
>  
>
But I will look up Omnioutliner and oXygen. Under no circumstance, 
though, can I give up TeXShop. After all, even though it had a 
reasonable outliner mode which I used a lot, I gave up—gladly if at a 
considerable price—MSWord.

Regards
--schremmer
--------------------- Info ---------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
           & FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Post: <mailto:MacOSX-TeX at email.esm.psu.edu>





More information about the macostex-archives mailing list